Author Topic: Why Fauci's hysteria about getting everyone tested when 20% test false negative?  (Read 2248 times)

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
https://healthwise.punchng.com/pcr-based-covid-19-tests-may-give-20-false-negative-results-scientists/

"PCR-based COVID-19 tests may give 20% false negative results –Scientists
By
Tessy Igomu
June 10, 2020

"New research carried out by a team of scientists from Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America, has revealed that Polymerise Chain Reaction-based COVID-19 tests may have a false negative rate of 20 per cent or more, depending on when it is done and when the sample is taken."

"In all, they identified seven studies that included data from 1,330 patient samples, including hospitalised patients and those managing their symptoms at home.

Their analysis showed that the likelihood of a false-negative result varied depending on the time since infection.

“It appears that the virus is not detectable immediately after infection.

“On the first day of infection, the probability of missing a diagnosis, i.e., a false-negative result was 100 per cent.

“At day 4 after exposure to the virus, the probability of a false-negative result seems to reduce to 67 per cent.

“By day 8, it decreases to 20 per cent, beginning to increase again afterwards. And by 3 weeks post-exposure, the chance of a false negative result reaches 66 per cent,”
the authors estimated.

Explaining further, they said the results indicate that the virus is difficult to detect by RT-PCR in the days immediately following infection, suggesting that “this testing route offers limited value during 3–5 days of post-infection).”

The authors warned against taking major decisions, such as removing Personal Protective Equipment or ending quarantine, based on results obtained within the period

The researchers also noted that 8 days following exposure, which is calculated to be roughly equivalent to 3 days following the onset of symptoms, is the optimal time for testing.

“At this time, the risk of obtaining a false-negative result is at its lowest, although there is still a 1 in 5 chance of obtaining such a result,” they said.

The researchers stated further that the reasons for such a high rate of false negatives, beyond technique-associated error, include differences in the amount of viral genetic material in people’s samples and differences in sample collection techniques.

Based on their findings, the authors conclude that it is important to exercise caution when interpreting the results of RT-PCR tests for COVID-19, particularly if the test was done early in the course of infection.

If an individual has symptoms consistent with COVID-19 but tests negative, the authors suggest not ruling out infection and carefully considering the “clinical and epidemiologic situation.”
____________________________

So what's the reason for Fauci's hysteria (and others gloming onto it) about getting everyone tested - as many people as possible - when 20% to 100% of PCR tests return false negatives? Wouldn't that more indicate that there is no value or even a negative value to testing? Particularly if it is used to determine a course of treatment since the article quoted below suggests that at day 4 there is still a 67% chance of a false negative, even though that is getting toward the end of the narrow window to begin early intervention with anti-virals, for the most successful outcome.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=18.0
« Last Edit: March 10, 2021, 05:33:34 AM by admin »
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
New Details in Covid Testing Scandal - 97% false positives - "Casedemic"
https://thehighwire.com/videos/new-details-in-covid-testing-scandal/
___________________________________________

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/508383-fatal-flaws-covid-test/
"A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid and is demanding it’s urgently axed. As they should
1 Dec, 2020 18:59

A peer review from a group of 22 international experts has found 10 “major flaws” in the main protocol for such tests. The report systematically dismantles the original study, called the Corman-Drosten paper, which described a protocol for applying the PCR technique to detecting Covid.

The Corman-Drosten paper was published on January, 23, 2020, just a day after being submitted, which would make any peer review process that took place possibly the shortest in history. What is important about it is that the protocol it describes is used in around 70 percent of Covid kits worldwide. It’s cheap, fast – and absolutely useless.

The 10 deadly sins

Among the fatal flaws that totally invalidate the PCR testing protocol are that the test:

    is non-specific, due to erroneous primer design

    is enormously variable

    cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments

    has no positive or negative controls

    has no standard operating procedure

    does not seem to have been properly peer reviewed

Oh dear. One wonders whether anything at all was correct in the paper. But wait – it gets worse. As has been noted previously, no threshold for positivity was ever identified. This is why labs have been running 40 cycles, almost guaranteeing a large number of false positives – up to 97 percent, according to some studies.

The cherry on top, though, is that among the authors of the original paper themselves, at least four have severe conflicts of interest. Two of them are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance, the sinisterly named journal that published the paper. And at least three of them are on the payroll of the first companies to perform PCR testing!"

much more
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/508383-fatal-flaws-covid-test/
« Last Edit: July 22, 2021, 07:22:42 AM by admin »
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment