As of January 14th 2021 the NIH eased restrictions on Ivermectin, but only after changing the political landscape through the
genocide of disproportionately killed black and Hispanic Americans as well as the elderly and the sickest and least able among us. Hundreds of thousands of Americans were sacrificed on the alter of politics and suffered completely unnecessary horrific deaths that were directly the result of being deprived of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, as we have been reporting for many months.
It is well past time to arrest and put on trial for crimes against humanity, Anthony Fauci and his NIH, as well as the heads of the FDA, CDC and every politician and media organization and taking head who spoke out against hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin. Even tepid response to it was inexcusable, and remains inexcusable, in light of tens of thousands of Americans continuing to die every month.
However there have been
a few brave doctors - heroes - that have bucked the system here in the U.S. ever since the beginning of the pandemic.
A year into the "pandemic" that never had to be - after embarrassingly large numbers of the
populations of second and third world countries have been very simply, inexpensively and very successfully treated for COVID-19 en masse with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin -
only after changing the political landscape through the completely unnecessary deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans did the NIH change its tune. In 2020 the NIH first stigmatized the up to 100% effective early outpatient treatment hydroxychloroquine and then did the same to up to 100% effective in early treatment Ivermectin, by limiting it's recommendation to participants in trials only. Now the NIH has given this well known 30-year-old off-patent generic $10 drug for COVID-19, the same recommendation status as monoclonal antibodies & convalescent plasma, which is a ‘neither for nor against’ recommendation, which should hopefully encourage any humane, ethical and competent clinician that cares about his patients, to prescribe it off-label to heal them instead of letting them die.
This is what our national death spiral, could have otherwise looked like with early treatment and prophylaxis with ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine. The Peruvian government approved the use of Ivermectin, by decree, on May 8, 2020. In the case of the 8 Peruvian states charted, the distribution of ivermectin began as early as May 8th:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344469305_Real-World_Evidence_The_Case_of_Peru_Causality_between_Ivermectin_and_COVID-19_Infection_Fatality_Rate
This should be enough to drive the final nail in the ($3,100-$5,700 per patient) remdesivir/velkury coffin, and perhaps anyone that prescribes it instead of highly more effective $20 ivermectin from this point forward, should be scrutinized for medical malpractice/wrongful death, particularly since the
WHO recommends against the use of remdesivir (based on
a large trial that suggested it doesn't significantly reduce mortality nor even the length of hospital stay). This is of course why there will never be trials that pit remdesivir in one group against hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin in the other group. The trial would be halted for humanitarian reasons and the remdesivir group given one of the other drugs. Why would any doctor or hospital want to risk wrongful death lawsuits for having prescribed a less effective drug rather than one that has up to 100% efficacy in the early outpatient setting and has shown great efficacy in the other stages of COVID-19 disease as well.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=517.0If we instituted an immediate national obsession with prophylaxis and early treatment of COVID with ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, our death rate could drop to 1 to 5% of what it is today,
within a few weeks, the timing of which this Swiss hydroxychloroquine reverse model demonstrated:
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=18.msg384#msg384
