Author Topic: Are there signs of vaccine enhanced disease, judging by COVID death rates?  (Read 1705 times)

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
[added 6-1-22] Negative vaccine efficacy of COVID vaxxes against omicron might suggest vaccine-enhanced disease.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=1438.0 [end add]
_______________________________

Are there signs of vaccine enhanced disease/pathogenic priming/antibody dependent enhancement, based on the COVID death rates  in some of the most heavily vaccinated countries?

For a primer on what it is, we posted our first thread on the subject of vaccine enhanced disease on January 29, 2021:
What is "vaccine-enhanced disease" or "pathogenic priming"?

The post that follows this post regards the state of affairs in regard to vaccine enhanced disease.

Has the COVID death rate been a reflection of the success of widespread "vaccination"? The following chart starts on December 2 of 2020 at the very beginning of vaccine rollout, and ends at April 14, of 2022. The number of vaccine doses per 100 people is reflected in the bottom scale, with COVID death rate per million people on the left side vertical scale. As of the date of screen capture of the chart on 4-15, Cypress averaged over 2 doses per citizen while Malta boasts the highest vaccine rate in Europe averaging 2.43 per person.
Both countries recently posted their highest COVID death rates since the beginning of the pandemic.
Also added is Nigeria that is typical of the low vaccination and COVID death rates of so many African countries.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccinations-vs-covid-death-rate?country=CYP~MLT


Following is a bi-weekly chart of total COVID deaths in Cypress and Malta (with Nigeria tossed in), from the beginning of the pandemic.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/biweekly-covid-deaths-per-million-people?tab=chart&country=MLT~CYP


It wouldn't seem that the vaccines reduced the COVID death rate, since it was higher in 2022 than at any time since the beginning of the pandemic. This is particularly disturbing considering that the later Delta and Omicron variants of the last many months have been far less deadly than the original A/B strains of COVID-19 during 2020.

Indeed some of the most heavily vaccinated countries are turning in some of the worst performances. The following chart includes Cypress, Denmark, Norway, South Korea, Israel, United States, Italy, Belgium and Greece. There are some far worse examples, like Hong Kong, but adding their extreme limits distorts the chart by flattening the rest of the countries down near the bottom of the chart. You can add it yourself at this link.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccinations-vs-covid-death-rate?country=CYP~DNK~NOR~KOR~ISR~USA~ITA~BEL~GRC


The answer wouldn't seem to be to repeatedly volunteer to be a guinea pig in Big Pharma's investigational experiment (for which the trials aren't even scheduled to end until 2024), which could result in booster syndrome.

As the inventor of the mRNA technology platform Dr. Robert Malone recently shared from data collected at national levels:

"So Ontario's one example, there's multiple examples in Northern Europe, there's example of Scotland and United Kingdom, and now I'm being asked to consult with the president of Israel tonight regarding what they're seeing now with the third jab and the fourth jab that are not helping."
"So Senator Johnson you're exactly right and we call this confounding variables, and it's very difficult because there's so many overlapping things, doctor Risch can speak eloquently I'm sure about the challenges of confounding in these large data sets and we always have to be very cautious, but what we're seeing is the risk profile is a function of the number of vaccine doses, so we're seeing increased risk with one relative to none and increased with two relative to one and with three relative to two."

The confounding variables question was answered to by Yale School of Public Health's professor of epidemiology Dr. Harvey Risch:  "Well no actually, the Public Health U.K. has actually published a statement about this in their week 42 weekly report that showed that people who've had COVID and then get vaccinated have lower levels of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies, and this means - and since the vaccines don't address the nucleocapsid antigens, they only address the spike - it means that they're doing something that's damaging the immune response in a more general way than just what they do with the spike. And this is empirical data that Public Health U.K. has published. So we know that this is happening. It's not theoretical issue about all of the niceties about laboratory biology and virology about things that could happen, it's a real thing that's been really observed by VaR testing."
COVID-19: A Second Opinion - Senate testimony - a must-see video

Here is a chart of the COVID death rate for some country/region comparisons. Note that the United States and Europe threatened doctors for prescribing hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, while the countries where hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are as endemic as the malaria and parasites that they treat, have the lowest COVID death rates, while China was early-treating with hydroxychloroquine from the beginning of the pandemic:

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/biweekly-covid-deaths-per-million-people?tab=chart&country=USA~Africa~IND~Europe~CHN~Asia


The reason that only Nigeria's label appears in the following chart, is because the labels for Congo, Burundi, Chad, Madagascar, Tanzania, Niger, Camaroon, Nigeria, Ethiopia and Mali, are underneath it.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccinations-vs-covid-death-rate?time=2020-12-05..latest&country=COG~BDI~TCD~MDG~TZA~NER~CMR~NGA~ETH~MLI~USA



Which all seems to further confirm earlier observations of a surge in all-cause mortality, coincident with vaccine rollout, in most countries.



Regarding infection rates among heavily vaxxed countries: 
"AIDS-Like 'Chronic Covid' is Taking Over Europe, Australia and NZ"-Igor Chudov


« Last Edit: June 01, 2022, 12:18:58 PM by admin »
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
Re: Infections, Hospitalizations, Deaths Increase as ADE Takes Hold
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2022, 03:59:49 PM »
"Government of Canada data suggests the Triple Vaccinated are suffering Antibody Dependent Enhancement; and Pfizer & the FDA knew it would happen
By The Exposé on April 10, 2022   

Official Government data coming out of Canada shows that fully vaccinated individuals are now statistically over four times more likely to be infected with Covid-19, 1.5 times more likely to be hospitalised with Covid-19, and twice as likely to die of Covid-19 than not-vaccinated individuals.

The horrifying thing about these stats is that they do not take into account age or the length of time since a person was vaccinated, but still equate to an average that shows the Covid-19 injections are not just ineffective but actually seem to worsen the effects of Covid-19 infection.

These are the sort of figures you would expect to see if a vaccine was causing Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease and antibody-dependent enhancement, and it turns out the latest round of confidential Pfizer documents confirm that both Pfizer and the US Food & Drug Administration knew it was a possibility upon emergency approval of the mRNA jab.

Then they received evidence of it occurring, including several deaths, but decided to ignore it and claim “no new safety issues have been raised”.



Intensive research conducted by health experts throughout the years has brought to light increasing concerns about “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement” (ADE), a phenomenon where vaccines make the disease far worse by priming the immune system for a potentially deadly overreaction.

ADE can arise in several different ways but the best-known is dubbed the ‘Trojan Horse Pathway’. This occurs when non-neutralizing antibodies generated by past infection or vaccination fail to shut down the pathogen upon re-exposure.

Instead, they act as a gateway by allowing the virus to gain entry and replicate in cells that are usually off limits (typically immune cells, like macrophages). That, in turn, can lead to wider dissemination of illness, and over-reactive immune responses that cause more severe illness.

Even Dr Anthony Fauci, the Chief Medical Adviser to the President of the United States, admitted when discussing the Covid-19 vaccine, that this would not be the first time a vaccine that initially looked good, actually made people worse.

https://rumble.com/embed/vp5oiw/?pub=4

In 2016, a dengue virus vaccine was designed to protect against all four serotypes of the virus. The hope was that by inducing immune responses to all four serotypes at once, the vaccine could circumvent the issues related to ADE following disease with dengue virus. The vaccine was given to children in the Philippines. However, fourteen vaccinated children died after encountering dengue virus in the community as they had developed antibody responses that were not capable of neutralizing the natural virus circulating in the community.

In previous clinical trials of vaccine candidates to combat SARS and MERS, the studies each failed during the animal phase due to ADE also known as pathogenic priming or a cytokine storm.

Phase three clinical trials are designed to uncover frequent or severe side effects before a vaccine is approved for use, including ADE.

But here in lies the problem, none of the Covid-19 vaccines have completed phase three clinical trials.

The Pfizer phase three trial is not due to complete until February 8th 2024, after previously being estimated to complete in April 2023."



However, of the information collated by Pfizer so far in the ongoing study they have conducted, it is clear to see that they were fully aware in February 2021 that antibody-dependent enhancement was a possible consequence of their Covid-19 injection, and it appears they also knew by April 2021 that the phenomenon was killing people.

Confidential Pfizer Documents

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been forced by court order to publish all confidential documents sent to them by Pfizer in regard to emergency use approval of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection.

The latest round of documents were published 1st April 22, and one of those documents is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’.

Table 5, found on page 11 of the document shows an ‘Important Potential Risk’, and that risk is listed as ‘Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), including Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Reporatory Disease (VAERD)’.



Vaccine-associated enhanced diseases (VAED) are modified presentations of clinical infections affecting individuals exposed to a wild-type pathogen after having received a prior vaccination for the same pathogen. Whereas, Vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory (VAERD) disease refers to disease with predominant involvement of the lower respiratory tract.

Enhanced responses are triggered by failed attempts to control the infecting virus, and VAED typically presents with symptoms related to the target organ of the infection pathogen. According to scientists VAED occurs as two different immunopathologies, antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and vaccine-associated hypersensitivity (VAH).

Pfizer claim in their confidential document stamped in April 2021, that up to 28th Feb 2021, they had received 138 cases reporting 317 potentially relevant events indicative of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease. Of these 71 were medically signifiant resulting in 8 disabilities, 13 were life-threatening events, and 38 of the 138 people died.

Of the 317 relevant events reported by 138 people, 135 were labelled as ‘drug ineffective’, 53 were labelled as dyspnoea (struggling to breathe), 23 were labelled as Covid-19 pneumonia, 8 were labelled as respiratory failure, and 7 were labelled as seizure.

Pfizer also admitted that 75 of the 101 subjects with confirmed Covid-19 following vaccination, had severe disease resulting in hospitalisation, disability, life-threatening consequences of death.

But Pfizer still definitively concluded, for the purposes of their submitted safety data to the Food and Drug Administration, the very data that was needed to gain emergency use authorisation and make them billions and billions of dollars, that ‘None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED’.

But Pfizer then went on to confirm that based on the current evidence, VAED remains a theoretical risk.

At the time of this confidential report being written in early 2021, Pfizer claimed hat their Covid-19 injection was 95% effective at preventing infection. So how on earth did they not definitively conclude that VAED was to blame when 75% of the confirmed “break-through” cases reported to them were severe disease resulting in hospitalisation, disability, life-threatening consequences of death?

These early warning signs were ignored by Pfizer to ensure they could make their billions, and dismissed by the FDA which simply took Pfizer’s claims at face value. If corruption wasn’t so rife in the pharmaceutical industry then perhaps we would not be seeing such devastating figures as the ones being published by the Government of Canada.

Evidence of VAED & ADE

The Government of Canada produces a daily Covid-19 Epidemiology update, in which they sporadically provide new data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths as and when they feel like it.

The following table is taken from their latest update, found here, and shows the number of cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status ip to 20th March 22 –



At first glance that looks pretty bad for the unvaccinated and pretty good for the fully vaccinated doesn’t it? But looks can be extremely deceiving.

Because the data shown above stretches all the way back to 14th December 2020, under the justification that this is the date the first Covid-19 injection was administered.

But guess what happened just after that first injection was administered? Canada experienced it’s largest wave of Covid-19 deaths to date, and just 0.3% of the entire population of Canada were considered fully vaccinated by the end of it.



So naturally, the Government of Canada is able to include a humongous amount of deaths that occurred among the unvaccinated when 99.7% of Canada was in fact unvaccinated.

But thanks to the gift of the ‘WayBackMachine’, we can look at previous Government of Canada Covid-19 Daily Epidemiology Update’ reports to deduce who is actually accounting for the majority of these deaths, hospitalisations and cases in the present day.

The following table is taken from a report published early March 2022, and it shows the number of cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status between 14th Dec 2020 and 13th February 2022.

Now all we have to do is carry out simple subtraction to deduce who is accounting for the most recent wave of Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths in Canada, and these are the results…









According to the Government of Canada, 87% of cases, 71% of hospitalisations and 75% of deaths were recorded among the fully vaccinated population between 14th Feb and 20th March 22 across Canada.

But how does this weigh up in respect of the case, hospitalisation and death-rates per 100,000 population? Well, again the Government of Canada doesn’t make it easy to find out, but they do give enough information for us to be able to calculate them ourselves.

Firstly, they give us the total number of people across Canada who have been vaccinated, and tell us how many doses they have had.


https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/epidemiological-summary-covid-19-cases.html

The population of Canada is 38.01 million, therefore with 25 million people having received at least one dose across Canada this leaves 13.01 million unvaccinated Canadians.

The following chart shows the population size of each vaccine group as of 20th March 22 –



Now that we know that all we need to do is divide the population size of each vaccine group by 100,000 and then divide the number of cases, hospitalisations and deaths in each vaccine group by the answer to that equation to work out the case, hospitalisation and death rates per 100,000 individuals.

e.g. – 13.01 million / 100,000 = 130.1
15,521 Unvaccinated Cases / 130.1 = 119.3
Case-rate = 119.3 per 100,000


The following two charts show the case, hospitalisation and death-rates per 100,000 by vaccination status across Canada between 14th Feb and 20th March 22 –



The data shows that on average, triple vaccinated people are 3 times more likely to be infected with Covid-19, 1.2 times more likely to be hospitalised with Covid-19, and 1.5 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.

But at the moment things seem worse for the double vaccinated, who are on average 4.3 times more likely to be infected with Covid-19, 1.4 times more likely to be hospitalised with Covid-19, and 1.7 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.

However, things may actually be much worse for the triple vaccinated than they appear for two reasons –

    Many Canadian’s are getting the third dose of the vaccine every day.
    Triple Vaccinated Canadian’s are not considered as triple vaccinated for at least two weeks after they receive the third dose.

If the rates per 100,000 are higher among the vaccinated, which they are, then this means the Covid-19 injections are proving to have a negative effectiveness in the real-world. And by using Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula we can accurately decipher what the real world effectiveness among each age group actually is.

Pfizer’s vaccine formula: Unvaccinated Rate per 100k – Vaccinated Rate per 100k / Unvaccinated Rate per 100k x 100 = Vaccine Effectiveness

The following chart shows the real world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against infection among the double vaccinated and triple vaccinated population in Canada, based on the rates provided above –



Don’t forget, when Pfizer “definitively” concluded, for the purposes of their submitted safety data to the Food and Drug Administration, that ‘None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED’, they also made the claim that the Covid-19 mRNA injection was 95% effective.

So why does official Government of Canada data show that the Covid-19 injection has negative effectiveness as low as minus-328% against infection, minus-41.3% against hospitalisation, and minus-74.4% against death?

Pfizer cannot be trusted.

The company was hit with the largest healthcare fraud settlement and criminal fine to date in 2009. The $2.3 billion fine against Pfizer was sparked by whistleblower John Kopchinski, who said Pfizer was promoting its drugs “for problems far wider than approved uses.  He contended that this put patients at risk of heart attacks, strokes and blood clots. ‘At Pfizer I was expected to increase profits at all costs, even when sales meant endangering lives. I couldn’t do that.’”

Pfizer has been repeatedly sued for illegally promoting their drugs, putting patient’s lives at risk.  During one court case for Neurontin in 2009, Pfizer sent an ex-CIA agent to the home of a whistleblower, Dr. David Franklin, who was due to testify in court the following day. 

Franklin had testified in another Neurontin case in 2004; Pfizer pled guilty and paid a $430 million settlement.

In 2009, the day before he was to testify again, the Pfizer investigator called Franklin’s wife repeatedly and then came to their home, blocked the driveway, looked through the windows shouting at his wife, “and would not leave until his wife called the police,” terrifying the family, including an eight-year-old child.

The year before Dr. Franklin was visited by Pfizer’s private investigator, The New York Times published extensive evidence that Pfizer “manipulated the publication of scientific studies to bolster the use of its epilepsy drug Neurontin for other disorders, while suppressing research that did not support those uses.

Pfizer’s tactics included delaying the publication of studies that had found no evidence the drug worked, ‘spinning’ negative data to place it in a more positive light, and bundling negative findings with positive studies to neutralize the results.”

In another recent case, the US Justice Department announced Pfizer agreed to pay $23.85 Million for paying kickbacks and saddling Medicare with extra costs.  As part of the 2018 settlement, Pfizer signed a corporate integrity agreement which is in effect until 2023.  It’s the fourth corporate integrity agreement Pfizer signed with the US federal government in a 16 year period.  The previous ones were in 2002, 2004 and 2009.

So why on earth should we believe Pfizer when they claim “None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED” and “No new safety issues have been raised”?

The real-world data does not lie.

The Covid-19 injection makes recipients more likely to be infected with Covid-19, more likely to be hospitalised with Covid-19, and more likely to die of Covid-19.

Therefore, the Covid-19 injection causes Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease and Antibody-Dependent Enhancement.

Both Pfizer and the FDA knew this was a possibility when the injection was given emergency use authorisation, and they knew just two months later that it was happening and that people had died, but they swept it under the carpet, and now real people are having to suffer the consequences."

Always best read at the link:
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/10/gov-canada-data-pfizer-vaccinated-suffering-ade/
« Last Edit: May 16, 2022, 07:51:08 AM by admin »
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
Re: Infections, Hospitalizations, Deaths Increase as ADE Takes Hold
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2022, 04:30:39 PM »
"Infections, Hospitalizations, Deaths Increase in Canada for the Doubly and Triply “Vaccinated” as Antibody-Dependent Enhancement Takes Hold
 by Lance D. Johnson
April 12, 2022

Covid-19 is supposedly “ending,” but infections, hospitalizations and deaths have only increased in vaccinated populations over the past months. The data is clear in Canada. According to the Canadian government, the doubly and triply vaccinated are more likely to be infected, experience severe disease, be hospitalized or die from covid-19. However, this historic medical malfeasance is being swept under the rug. The world is learning to live with vaccine failure, namely antibody-dependent enhancement.

FDA ignored evidence of ADE for Pfizer’s covid mRNA

When the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Pfizer’s covid-19 mRNA, they completely ignored the risk of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), even though there was clear evidence that this phenomenon was occurring after vaccination [table 5]. ADE occurs when virus-specific antibodies enhance the entry and replication of a virus in mammalian cells.

The covid-19 mRNA jab uses lipid nano-particles to bypass the innate immune response. By evading the first lines of detection and forcing replication of spike proteins inside the body, the covid-19 mRNA injection causes an incomplete immune response that is non-neutralizing. This non-neutralizing response signals T cells to deal with the artificial infection, but the response is indirect and unable to generate a complete cell-mediated, helper T-cell-1 and 2 response — resulting in a weak B cell memory. While the non-neutralizing antibodies provide some sort of measurable immune response, it is not durable in the long term and sometimes not even effective in the short term.

The non-neutralizing, virus-specific antibodies allow future mutations of the virus to readily enter the cell and infect macrophages and other immune cells. This process causes an over-reactive immune response that leads to severe disease upon subsequent infection. These non-neutralizing immune responses can be brought on by a natural infection that did not convey neutralizing antibodies upon first exposure or can be the result of poorly-designed mRNA vaccines that systematically destroy human immune function.When the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Pfizer’s covid-19 mRNA, they completely ignored the risk of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), even though there was clear evidence that this phenomenon was occurring after vaccination [table 5]. ADE occurs when virus-specific antibodies enhance the entry and replication of a virus in mammalian cells.

The covid-19 mRNA jab uses lipid nano-particles to bypass the innate immune response. By evading the first lines of detection and forcing replication of spike proteins inside the body, the covid-19 mRNA injection causes an incomplete immune response that is non-neutralizing. This non-neutralizing response signals T cells to deal with the artificial infection, but the response is indirect and unable to generate a complete cell-mediated, helper T-cell-1 and 2 response — resulting in a weak B cell memory. While the non-neutralizing antibodies provide some sort of measurable immune response, it is not durable in the long term and sometimes not even effective in the short term.

The non-neutralizing, virus-specific antibodies allow future mutations of the virus to readily enter the cell and infect macrophages and other immune cells. This process causes an over-reactive immune response that leads to severe disease upon subsequent infection. These non-neutralizing immune responses can be brought on by a natural infection that did not convey neutralizing antibodies upon first exposure or can be the result of poorly-designed mRNA vaccines that systematically destroy human immune function.

When the FDA received evidence of ADE, they brushed it aside, right along with a long list of side effects that include death. The Pfizer documents were intended for release 75 years from now, but a court order is forcing the FDA to release the files in 2022. These documents reveal that the FDA ignored evidence of ADE. There were 101 cases of covid-19 after vaccination and 75 of the cases were severe, “resulting in hospitalization, disability, life-threatening consequences or death.” The agency knew that these vaccines depleted the human immune system and caused severe adverse reactions. The vaccines were forcefully pushed onto the population regardless, as the agency claimed, “no new safety issues have been raised.”

Canadian government admits that doubly and triply vaccinated are experiencing higher infection, hospitalization and death rates

By sweeping vaccine failure under the rug, medical atrocities are being carried out in real time. The Government of Canada is now releasing data showing that the doubly and triply vaccinated are suffering from ADE. Statistically, Canadians are now four times more likely to be infected with a coronavirus variant if they are vaccinated. The triply vaccinated are more likely to get infected and spread infections, and they are also 1.5 times more likely to be hospitalized with covid-19 and twice as likely to die from these infections (when compared to the non-vaccinated cohort).

According to the Government of Canada’s Covid-19 Epidemiology Update, from February 14 to March 20th, vaccine effectiveness dropped into serious negative territory, enhancing disease, increasing hospitalizations and deaths. When it comes to getting infected, two doses are now -328.3% “effective” and three doses are -208% “effective.” Two doses increase hospitalizations (-41.3% effective) and so does three doses (-19.3% effective). Death rates also increase for two doses (-74.4% effective) and three doses (-52.3% effective). If trends continue, data for the fourth (and eventually the fifth dose) will show further infectious disease spread, lack of hospital bed capacity, and accelerated death.



Antibody-dependent enhancement is not new

A promising dengue vaccine candidate was tested on Philippine children in 2016. Because the vaccine induced immune responses to all four serotypes of the dengue virus, scientists believed it would illicit durable immunity in children. However, four children died after vaccination because the antibody responses were non-neutralizing and destroyed the children’s ability to adapt to future dengue infection.

During the clinical trials for SARS and MERS vaccines (also coronaviruses), animals were more likely to suffer from ADE, pathogenic priming and enhanced disease. A cytokine storm resulted, killing many animals. Pfizer’s phase three clinical trial for covid-19 mRNA is being conducted, not on animals this time, but forcefully on humans. The clinical trials are set to end in April 2023, and human populations are being destroyed in the process.

Who knew that surveillance of vaccine status could ultimately be used to highlight the issue of ADE in the real world? This brings up the question: How many of the original covid-19 deaths (pre-covid-19 vaccine) were caused by ADE, coronavirus interference or pathogenic priming from the seasonal influenza vaccines? There is evidence to suggest that the influenza vaccine supply causes coronavirus interference and enhanced infection as well. Evidence also shows that natural infection with influenza A/H3N2 protects against highly pathogenic influenza A/H5N1 virus, but vaccination against influenza A/H3N2 virus actually reduces virus-specific CD8+ T cell responses and heterosubtypic immunity to the same pandemic influenza.

Perhaps, today’s forced vaccination and surveillance of human populations will ultimately be the undoing of the destructive, predatory vaccine industry — an industry that has hijacked government agencies, misled the public, destroyed human immune systems, and caused further suffering and death."

Sources include:

    DailyExpose.uk
    PHMPT.org [PDF]
    PubMed.gov
    ArcPointLabs.com
    NaturalNews.com
    NEJM.org
    Journals.Plos.org
    ClinicalTrials.gov
    PubMed.gov
    EuropePMC.org
    NATURAL NEWS

https://uncanceled.news/infections-hospitalizations-deaths-increase-in-canada-for-the-doubly-and-triply-vaccinated-as-antibody-dependent-enhancement-takes-hold/
« Last Edit: May 16, 2022, 07:51:44 AM by admin »
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
"Covid-19 Deaths are rising sharply in Australia and official data shows the Fully Vaccinated account for 4 in every 5 of them
By The Exposé on January 30, 2022

Australia is currently experiencing a sharp rise in Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths, but according to official New South Wales Government data, it isn’t the unvaccinated population who are to blame.

Instead Australia is very much experiencing a pandemic of the vaccinated, with 9 in every 10 cases, and hospitaliations, and 8 in every 10 deaths between 26th Nov 21 and 8th Jan 22 recorded as being among the triple/double vaccinated population.



According to official data, New South Wales (NSW) Australia has seen confirmed Covid-19 cases increase ten-fold since the middle of December 2021, breaking records for the number of confirmed cases in the region since Covid-19 first struck in March 2020.



On the 14th Dec 21, NSW recorded 1,347 cases in a single day. But fast forward one month and we can see that the state recorded 48,133 cases in a single day on the 14th Jan 22.

The same can be said in terms of Covid-19 deaths. Since the new year deaths have skyrocketed to the highest levels seen throughout the entire pandemic.



On the 29th Dec 21, NSW recorded just a single Covid-19 death, but fast forward to the 17th Jan 22 and we find that the state of NSW recorded 36 Covid-19 deaths in a single day, the highest number recorded to date.

But it isn’t the unvaccinated population who are accounting for the record breaking number of Covid-19 cases and deaths, it’s the fully vaccinated.

The NSW Government publish a weekly Covid-19 Weekly Surveillance Report, the most recent of which was published on 13th Jan 22, containing data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths by vaccination status up to January 1st 2022.

Page 8 of the report (found here), shows us the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status, and it reveals that since Omicron was allegedly discovered, there have been a total of 273,511 confirmed cases among all those eligible for vaccination (age 12+) in NSW, Australia.

And a shocking 267,381 of those cases have been recorded as being among the vaccinated population,



A further 2,578 cases were confirmed among the partly vaccinated, but just 3,552 cases were confirmed among the not-vaccinated population. This means that between 26th Nov 21 and 8th Jan 22, the vaccinated population accounted for 99% of Covid-19 cases in NSW, Australia.

Page 8 of the report (found here), also shows us the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations by vaccination status, and again we find that the vast majority have been among the vaccinated population.



A further 2,578 cases were confirmed among the partly vaccinated, but just 3,552 cases were confirmed among the not-vaccinated population. This means that between 26th Nov 21 and 8th Jan 22, the vaccinated population accounted for 99% of Covid-19 cases in NSW, Australia.

Page 8 of the report (found here), also shows us the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations by vaccination status, and again we find that the vast majority have been among the vaccinated population.



According to the report between 26th Nov 21 and 8th Jan 22 there have been 3,022 Covid-19 hospitalisations in NSW, Australia.

Of these the triple/double vaccinated accounted for a frightening 2,627, the partly vaccinated accounted for 80, and the not-vaccinated population accounted for just 315.

This means the vaccinated population accounted for 90% of Covid-19 hospitalisations since Omicron struck.

Unlike in the UK, where celebrities and politicians have been able to make false claims about the vaccination status of the majority of Covid-19 patients in ICU because of the lack of data, the NSW Government kindly inform the public of the number of Covid-19 patients in ICU and their vaccination status.

Page 8 of the report (found here), shows us that between 26th Nov 21 and 8th Jan 22, there were 282 patients eligible for vaccination who were in ICU with Covid-19, and yet again the vast majority were triple/double vaccinated.



The fully vaccinated made up 215of those ICU patients, whilst the partly vaccinated accounted for 12, and the not-vaccinated for just 55.

This means that between 26th Nov 21 and 8th Jan 22, the vaccination population made up 81% of all Covid-19 patients in ICU.

Finally we come to Covid-19 deaths. Page 8 of the report (found here), reveals the number of Covid-19 deaths between 26th Nov 21 and 8th Jan 22 by vaccination status, and in all there were a total of just 91 deaths.

However, we know from other available data that the state fo NSW, Australia is now nearly recording more deaths in a single day as of 28th Jan 22 than it did in the entire period between 26th Nov and 8th Jan.



Yet again, according to the NSW Government report, the fully vaccinated accounted for the majority of deaths recording a total of 67, with a further 3 deaths being recorded among the partly vaccinated population, and just 21 deaths were recorded among the not-vaccinated population.

This means that between 26th Nov 21 and 8th Jan 22, the vaccinated population accounted for 77% of all Covid-19 deaths.

Vaccination was billed as the solution to “a pandemic that never was”, in Australia. Now it looks like that pandemic is just beginning, and it is very much a pandemic of the fully vaccinated."

Best read at link:
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/30/australias-pandemic-of-the-fully-vaccinated/
« Last Edit: May 16, 2022, 07:52:20 AM by admin »
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/uk-will-hide-vaccinated-cases-and?s=r

"UK will HIDE Vaccinated Cases and Deaths
Just as I predicted EXACTLY A MONTH AGO

   
Igor Chudov
Mar 18

Feeling like a Cassandra… My article from February 17 (a month ago)…
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/will-ukhsa-also-hide-vaccinated-and?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web&s=r

Will UKHSA also Hide Vaccinated and Boosted Deaths?
Scotland folded; UKHSA next?

Igor Chudov
Feb 17

I wrote an article yesterday about Scotland deciding to HIDE deaths of vaccinated and boosted people, in order to not provide truthful materials for “Antivaxxer misinformation”.

Scotland will HIDE Vaccinated and Boosted Deaths
The data looks bad... So hide the data!

Igor Chudov
Feb 16
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/scotland-will-hide-vaccinated-and?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web&s=r

Oddly enough, Scotland did not decide to actually look into this, or study specific vaccinated people who are dying at greater rates than vaccine-free people, to figure out what is happening. Scotland did not also try to find ways to save the poor dying vaccinated people either.

Instead, Scotland’s health officials decided to simply stop reporting deaths among vaccinated and boosted people. The vaccine, you see, is so safe and effective, that it does not need no stinking reporting.

The question is, will UKHSA fold also and stop reporting vaccinated cases and deaths? The weekly vaccine report is so terrible that, I am sure, there is a lot of pressure on UKHSA to stop reporting this inconvenient data.

    As 90-day reinfections started to count after Jan 31, the four weeks covered by the UKHSA report now include two weeks of reinfections. As the vaccinated people are much more likely to be reinfected, this change in counting further illustrated the vaccine disaster, as the boosted case rates in some categories are THREE TIMES greater than unvaccinated case rates.

    Let this sink in: the boosted 40-49 year olds, protected by TRIPLE DOSE of spike protein goodness, are THREE TIMES MORE LIKELY TO CATCH COVID, than the vaccine-free. A huge part of this now is reinfections.

    The death protection, still conferred to the “boosted” by the vaccine, is going down every week

All of this makes me apprehensive that UKHSA will soon stop reporting deaths and cases in the vaccnated people, due to pressure to hide the disaster that is unfolding in the UK.

Here’s a typical attack article on UKHSA from so called “fact checkers”:    As 90-day reinfections started to count after Jan 31, the four weeks covered by the UKHSA report now include two weeks of reinfections. As the vaccinated people are much more likely to be reinfected, this change in counting further illustrated the vaccine disaster, as the boosted case rates in some categories are THREE TIMES greater than unvaccinated case rates.

    Let this sink in: the boosted 40-49 year olds, protected by TRIPLE DOSE of spike protein goodness, are THREE TIMES MORE LIKELY TO CATCH COVID, than the vaccine-free. A huge part of this now is reinfections.

    The death protection, still conferred to the “boosted” by the vaccine, is going down every week

All of this makes me apprehensive that UKHSA will soon stop reporting deaths and cases in the vaccnated people, due to pressure to hide the disaster that is unfolding in the UK.

Here’s a typical attack article on UKHSA from so called “fact checkers”:



Just How Bad is the Latest Report?

Whilst cases among vaccine-free Brits decreased by 20%, the cases among boosted persons decreased only by 5%.



This data comes from page 44:



So we can see that the boosted people are kind of having it rough at the moment and have 2-3 times the number of “Covid Cases” compared to the vaccine-free.

Whilst the booster still provides “death protection”, the degree of this protection drops every week, sadly. I keep track of this in a spreadsheet for you:



Circled are last week’s calculations of “Vaccine Effectiveness” (VE) in preventing death, by age category. Very disturbing pattern is a freefall in protection for the youngest 19-29 age category. I hope that this is simply a result of data fluke and not development of immune deficiency in your youngest and most precious UK adults."

Much much more:
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/will-ukhsa-also-hide-vaccinated-and?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web&s=r
« Last Edit: April 23, 2022, 10:19:19 AM by admin »
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242430

"I hate being right.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.07.21253098v2

"In this study we profiled vaccine-induced polyclonal antibodies as well as plasmablast derived mAbs from individuals who received SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccine. Polyclonal antibody responses in vaccinees were robust and comparable to or exceeded those seen after natural infection. However, the ratio of binding to neutralizing antibodies after vaccination was greater than that after natural infection and, at the monoclonal level, we found that the majority of vaccine-induced antibodies did not have neutralizing activity."

This is not good.  Now we know why the stabs target very high antibody titers -- several times that of natural infection, and the doses were not adjusted down.

I had wondered about that: It makes exactly no sense to target wildly-higher titers than natural infection with a vaccine, yet all of the shots do exactly that.  The question was why and now we have the answer: A large percentage of the antibodies produced are not neutralizing, so to get enough that are they cranked up the dose.

This is dangerous -- very dangerous -- because the non-neutralizing antibodies can enhance infection.  What we don't know, because we didn't take the time, is whether the decay is linear in both sorts or whether one decays first.  But again, this is data we did not have before we mass-stabbed people -- and unfortunately it explains why dosing was set where it was and that fact, and the potential bad side of all those non-neutralizing antibodies, which could lead to SEVERE ADE and kill you down the road was never discussed nor explained by any of the manufacturers.

Let's contemplate a possibility: The manufacturers know this and in fact knew it during Phase I and II testing; they characterized the antibodies produced and that is why they set the dose where they did; they knew that they had to wildly over-produce to get a high enough titer of the neutralizing antibodies or the shots would not work.

Now think about the game that might have been run:

1. You take the shot.

2. You get both protective (good) and non-protective (neutral) or possibly enhancing (very bad), antibodies.

3. The protective antibodies are enough to prevent you from getting seriously sick or dying.  We all cheer, and all appears to be well in the world.  The results look good -- for a while.

4. Over time the antibody titer wanes.  Now you don't have enough neutralizing antibodies but still have some of the bad ones which, if you get infected, make it materially more-likely the infection will kill you.

5. Then in comes the nice pharma dude who tells you to take this booster shot, which by the way isn't free and for which the price goes up every year, irrespective of the side effects which are real and remain (and might kill or seriously disable, and which risk you must accept every year forever into the future), or you're very likely to die because the virus is still out there and all you have are the bad antibodies that make an infection worse.  While those too will wane over time it may take years before you're back to where you started before the stab in terms of risk.

Is this plausible?  You bet.

They knew damn well that this proportion between neutralizing and non-neutralizing was present right up front.  That's why they set the dosing where they did; they had to in order to get a neutralizing titer that was high enough.  But that also means they knew it would decay and when it did the non-neutralizing antibodies would still be present to some degree.

Why did the companies not work on getting rid of the non-neutralizing titer?  They didn't have to.  The EUA didn't require it and further, if they got away with it long enough to get crap-ton of shots in arms there was nothing that could be done about it.

Take the shot once, buy in forever to whatever price they charge and if you don't, and get Covid-19, you die.

Obamacare was all about forcing you to buy health insurance.  The penalty for non-compliance with the medical monster and government's scheme was money, which Congress eventually got rid of.

But if this problem proves up to be true the penalty, once you buy in originally (and which is conveniently "free") should you try to refuse to continue later on, irrespective of the price the company charges, is death.

Of course this little problem would have been discovered in a full 5 or 10 year trial where you give someone one shot and then follow them.  Inevitably as it wore off a year or two down the road you'd see indications of trouble as some of those people would get the virus naturally and get ridiculously hammered.  But not if you go Warp Speed, as you simply don't wait long enough for the antibody titer to wane.  Oh, and then they lobby for full licensing on an expedited basis (instead of the usual 5 or 10 year cycle) too.  The reason for that is obvious, is it not?

Does this paper prove that?  Nope.  But could it be possible?  You bet.

And these are not quacks folks, or some group of Chinese that might be running a game on us.  This paper came out of Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York.

If you took the stab or do now you're literally betting your life that they're wrong.

Now do remember that the pharma companies involved all have legal immunity, even if it is later proved they knew this to be the case before they applied for EUA status."

"We also found a co-dominance of mAbs targeting the NTD and RBD of SARS-CoV-2 spike and an original antigenic-sin like backboost to seasonal human coronaviruses OC43 and HKU1."

"That's really bad too

OC43 and HKU1 are betacoronaviruses that produce colds and flus in humans; they're considered mild annoyances these days.  But one of them, OC43, is believed to have been a serious pandemic flu in the 1890 timeframe.  We can't prove it but sequencing, simple time analysis and reports from that time of people dying in the same sort of way as Covid-19 killed people are in the literature.  Between those it is a reasonable hypothesis that OC43 was the cause of that, and it was real.

But that means that if there's a boost to the virulence of OC43 it has a proved capacity to kill -- and might again, being potentiated by getting the jabs.

Again: This is one paper, it's a pre-print and not proved.   But it is science and not crack-potted assumption.

Shouldn't we have done all of this science before we jabbed a hundred million+ Americans with something that they are now stuck with and, if it proves up to be what's suggested in this study, may well be worse, on balance, than accepting a Covid-19 infection and using cheap drugs to treat it?That's really bad too.
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/vss-scientific-updates-during-pandemic-times-16

April 15, 2022
VSS Scientific Updates During Pandemic Times #16
By
Geert Vanden Bossche

1. AIDS-Like"Chronic Covid" is Taking Over Europe, Australia and NZ

“Chronic Covid is a situation where the vaccinated cannot develop natural immunity, cannot quickly clear infections, and remain ill and infectious for extended period of time. Such repeat infections progressively damage their immunity to the point of not being able to clear Covid at all. That would lead to people being chronically infected, infecting others, and overwhelmed with toxic Covid viral proteins, while remaining immuno-suppressed.”

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/aids-like-chronic-covid-is-taking?s=r
_______________________________________

"Geert Vanden Bossche received his DVM from the University of Ghent, Belgium, and his PhD degree in Virology from the University of Hohenheim, Germany. He held adjunct faculty appointments at universities in Belgium and Germany. After his career in Academia, Geert joined several vaccine companies (GSK Biologicals, Novartis Vaccines, Solvay Biologicals) to serve various roles in vaccine R&D as well as in late vaccine development.

Geert then moved on to join the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Health Discovery team in Seattle (USA) as Senior Program Officer; he then worked with the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) in Geneva as Senior Ebola Program Manager. At GAVI he tracked efforts to develop an Ebola vaccine. He also represented GAVI in fora with other partners, including WHO, to review progress on the fight against Ebola and to build plans for global pandemic preparedness.

Back in 2015, Geert scrutinized and questioned the safety of the Ebola vaccine that was used in ring vaccination trials conducted by WHO in Guinea. His critical scientific analysis and report on the data published by WHO in the Lancet in 2015 was sent to all international health and regulatory authorities involved in the Ebola vaccination program. After working for GAVI, Geert joined the German Center for Infection Research in Cologne as Head of the Vaccine Development Office. He is at present primarily serving as a Biotech / Vaccine consultant while also conducting his own research on Natural Killer cell-based vaccines."
__________________________________

Full article:  "AIDS-Like"Chronic Covid" is Taking Over Europe, Australia and NZ" - Igor Chudov
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=1397.0
« Last Edit: April 23, 2022, 07:07:03 AM by admin »
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34957554/

"Immunology. 2022 Apr;165(4):386-401. doi: 10.1111/imm.13443. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

New-onset autoimmune phenomena post-COVID-19 vaccination
Yue Chen  1   2 , Zhiwei Xu  3 , Peng Wang  4 , Xiao-Mei Li  5 , Zong-Wen Shuai  6 , Dong-Qing Ye  1   2 , Hai-Feng Pan  1   2
Affiliations

    PMID: 34957554 DOI: 10.1111/imm.13443

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to an unprecedented setback for global economy and health. Vaccination is one of the most effective interventions to substantially reduce severe disease and death due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination programmes are being rolled out globally, but most of these vaccines have been approved without extensive studies on their side-effects and efficacy. Recently, new-onset autoimmune phenomena after COVID-19 vaccination have been reported increasingly (e.g. immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, autoimmune liver diseases, Guillain-Barré syndrome, IgA nephropathy, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus). Molecular mimicry, the production of particular autoantibodies and the role of certain vaccine adjuvants seem to be substantial contributors to autoimmune phenomena. However, whether the association between COVID-19 vaccine and autoimmune manifestations is coincidental or causal remains to be elucidated. Here, we summarize the emerging evidence about autoimmune manifestations occurring in response to certain COVID-19 vaccines. Although information pertaining to the risk of autoimmune disease as a consequence of vaccination is controversial, we merely propose our current understanding of autoimmune manifestations associated with COVID-19 vaccine. In fact, we do not aim to disavow the overwhelming benefits of mass COVID-19 vaccination in preventing COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. These reports could help guide clinical assessment and management of autoimmune manifestations after COVID-19 vaccination."
« Last Edit: May 06, 2022, 12:48:04 PM by admin »
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
"New-onset autoimmune phenomena post-COVID-19 vaccination"
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34957554/
« Last Edit: May 07, 2022, 11:11:01 AM by admin »
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
"COVID Vaccines Destroy Natural Immunity To Make People Dependent On Booster Shots, UK Health Security Agency Reveals"
By Olivia Cavallaro
Oct 26, 2021 05:49 AM EDT

As the U.S. inches closer to reaching herd immunity against COVID, many people are still holding out and refusing to get vaccinated. Latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show that 220.5 million Americans 12 and above have already been vaccinated against COVID. But some are convinced that the vaccines do more harm than good.

NOQ Report cites Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), which is defined by the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia as an event that "occurs when the antibodies generated during an immune response recognize and bind to a pathogen, but they are unable to prevent infection." It is one of three scenarios that happens when a vaccinated person gets infected with the disease he or she is vaccinated against.

The first scenario is a mild illness in which the person can experience some symptoms, or a breakthrough illness in which people fall severely ill. The third scenario is ADE in which "the antibodies that the vaccine generated actually help the virus infect greater numbers of cells than it would have on its own."

The Blue State Conservative reported that as per a study published in December 2020, researchers Timothy Cardozo of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, NYU Langone Health, New York and Ronald Veazey of the Tulane National Primate Research Center in Covington, found that "COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated."

The study also concluded that "vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)."

Alex Berenson reported on a U.K. study that revealed similar results. The report was filed "COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report Week 42" from the U.K. Health Security Agency, which tackled seropositivity.

Seropositivity is defined as having a positive reaction in the test for the presence of an antibody. the study tested samples with Roche nucleoprotein (N) and Roche spike (S) antibody assays. The study noted, "Nucleoprotein (Roche N) assays only detect post-infection antibodies, whereas spike (Roche S) assays will detect both post-infection antibodies and vaccine-induced antibodies."

Now, the report said that "Seropositivity estimates for S antibody in blood donors are likely to be higher than would be expected in the general population and this probably reflects the fact that donors are more likely to be vaccinated."

Seropositivity as measured by an S antibody (meaning from the spike) reflects both infection and vaccination. Meanwhile, "Seropositivity estimates for N antibody will underestimate the proportion of the population previously infected" because of one of three reasons. THe first reason is that the blood donors whose blood was tested were less likely to be exposed to a natural infection than age matched individuals in the general population.

Another reason is that the N antibody response wanes over time. The third reason, as observed by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) surveillance data, is that the N antibody levels "appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination."

These N antibody levels that appear to be lower is because these people got the COVID vaccine. Note that the nucleoprotein N assays only detect post-infection antibodies, which may mean that the person who got vaccinated against COVID and then got a breakthrough infection has a lower rate of N antibody levels because he or she got a mild case of COVID."
https://www.christianitydaily.com/articles/13729/20211026/covid-vaccines-destroy-natural-immunity-to-make-people-dependent-on-booster-shots-uk-health-security-agency-reveals.htm
« Last Edit: May 25, 2022, 11:28:14 AM by admin »
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3090
bump
www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/
Over a million Americans died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and $20 EARLY treatment? https://www.covidtreatment