Please read the important disclaimer at the following link before proceeding further on this page. The administrator of this forum is not a doctor nor licensed or experienced in any aspect of the health care industry, so the subjects in this forum mainly depend on articles and videos by medical professionals that are imminently qualified.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=227.0[edit add 12/12/22]
Same viral load in vaxxed as unvaxxed
[end edit]
[edit 11-10-21] Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough on this subject as well as vaxxing kids
https://www.bitchute.com/video/617xtM2elQuv/ [end edit]
It was well known and reported even by Fauci and the WHO, that in 2020 there was essentially no asymptomatic spread of COVID-19.https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=551.0It would seem that Big Pharma has created hundreds of millions of asymptomatic transmitters of COVID-19 (and its'
variants they also create), toward never ending profits, when prior to the jabs the only way a person could transmit COVID was if they were symptomatic. Instead we have now and forever lost any opportunity to effectively quarantine infected persons, since short of testing there is no way for anyone to know whether they are infectious or not.
Right out of the gate the pharmaceutical companies knew their "vaccines" would not prevent a person from becoming infected with, or transmitting, COVID,
completely asymptomatically.
The best of all worlds for Big Pharma! Their opportunity to create an infinite number of additional
narrowly focused "vaccines", that creates even more opportunity to train additional variants to dodge "vaccines"!
Vaccine rollout ended any expectation that quarantine could ever be effective again. The only hope left in sight for ending the pandemic would seem to be mass distribution of ivermectin to both unvaccinated as well as vaccinated individuals. At just pennies per pill imagine how much money would be saved. But then the hospital Illness Industry would loose on average $73,300 for every COVID patient they didn't get a chance to treat, so don't expect people's lives to matter any more than they have over the last year and a half, any time soon!
[added 6-2-23]
The following video that was banned on YouTube (but is now available on one of the free speech platforms, BitChute, at the link below), includes Anthony Fauci stating: "In all the history of respiratory born viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there's a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers."
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kfpNvUFfuUZO/ [end added]
Asymptomatic spread was not a thing prior to the vaccines, except as lied about to create distrust among citizens, and cause some to view their neighbors as dangerous germ spreading vectors.
The following is from back in the pre-vaccine good ole days:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-wAsymptomatic Spread RevisitedJeffrey A. Tucker
– November 22, 2020
Excerpt:
"The fog of disease mitigation, indeed. But as with most of the “science” throughout this ordeal, it eventually came to be revealed that good sense and rationality would prevail over implausible claims and predictions that led to experiments in social control without any precedent.
In this case, the carrier of rationality is a gigantic
study conducted in Wuhan, China, of 10 million people. The article appears in Nature Communications, published November 20, 2020.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
The conclusion is not that asymptomatic spread is rare or that the science is uncertain. The study revealed something that hardly ever happens in these kinds of studies. There was not one documented case. Forget rare. Forget even Fauci’s previous suggestion that asymptomatic transmission exists but not does drive the spread. Replace all that with: never. At least not in this study for 10,000,000.
Stringent COVID-19 control measures were imposed in Wuhan between January 23 and April 8, 2020. Estimates of the prevalence of infection following the release of restrictions could inform post-lockdown pandemic management. Here, we describe a city-wide SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening programme between May 14 and June 1, 2020 in Wuhan. All city residents aged six years or older were eligible and 9,899,828 (92.9%) participated.
No new symptomatic cases and 300 asymptomatic cases (detection rate 0.303/10,000, 95% CI 0.270–0.339/10,000)
were identified. There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases. 107 of 34,424 previously recovered COVID-19 patients tested positive again (re-positive rate 0.31%, 95% CI 0.423–0.574%). The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan was therefore very low five to eight weeks after the end of lockdown.
One might suppose that this would be huge news. It would allow us to open up everything immediately. With the whole basis for post-curve-flattening lockdowns crumbled, we could go back to living a normal life. The fear could evaporate. We could take comfort in our normal intuition that healthy people can get out and about with no risk to others. We could take off our masks. We could go to movies and sports events.
From what I can tell, there was only one news story that was posted about this. It was on Russia Today. I’ve not been able to find another one. People not following the right accounts on Twitter wouldn’t even know about it at all.
We keep hearing about how we should follow the science. The claim is tired by now. We know what’s really happening. The lockdown lobby ignores whatever contradicts their narrative, preferring unverified anecdotes over an actual scientific study of 10 million residents in what was the world’s first major hotspot for the disease we are trying to manage. You would expect this study to be massive international news. So far as I can tell, it is being ignored.
With solid evidence that asymptomatic spread is nonsense, we have to ask: who is making decisions and why? Again, this brings me back to the metaphor of fog. We are all experiencing confusion and uncertainty over the precise relationship between the strategies and the goals of panoply of regulations and stringencies all around us. Even the rationale has become elusive – even refuted – as frustration and disorientation have displaced what we vaguely recall as clarity and rationality of daily life."
much more
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w____________________________________________
Since according to the above study, there was found to be ZERO chance of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19, lockdowns would seem meritless, and at least from this point going forward, evil. Not only lockdowns, but particularly business closings. The government desperately needs to keep the idea of asymptomatic spread alive or it will loose control over people's minds, and it will be more difficult for big government Statist fascists to continue their effort at eliminating small business to help advance their control over big business, while universally increasing dependency on government.
And what about the value of face masks? When everyone is wearing a face mask, how can you identify a person that's wearing it because they are actually symptomatic, so you can be careful to keep your distance
from them?
________________________________________
All to mitigate what was early-on recognized as "
.....from all respiratory infections it’s probably the easiest to treat", with millions of horrific and absolutely unnecessary deaths (at a minimum 85% were completely unnecessary deaths, while more like 99-100% of those who died, could have been saved with cheap, effective,
early treatment in the hands of skilled clinicians), all sacrificed on the alter of Big Pharma and
Illness Industry profits.
And all done in exchange for what gain? Certainly the FDA isn't offering any assurances:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download"8.4.Unknown Risks/Data Gaps"
"
Vaccine-enhanced diseaseAvailable data do not indicate a risk of vaccine-enhanced disease, and conversely suggest effectiveness against severe disease within the available follow-up period. However,
risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown and needs to be evaluated further in ongoing clinical trials and in observational studies that could be conducted following authorization and/or licensure."
Since there were no animal trials completed prior to vaccine release, it won't be until those that have been vaccinated immunity begins to wane and they are challenged by a wild virus, thanyone can know. But perhaps 2/3 of the
vaccine recipients may be dead from heart failure by then anyway. Perhaps not. Nobody can know.
Since the vaccine dramatically reduces symptoms, fully vaccinated persons that are infected, can be asymptomatic transmitters of the virus. So absent any symptoms,
how can a fully vaccinated person know whether they are transmitting COVID-19 to a parent or grandparent? How can a healthcare worker be confident they aren't transmitting COVID-19 to their patients?
Meanwhile the incidence of transmission by asymptomatic unvaccinated
persons, has been essentially zero, since the beginning of the pandemic.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=551.0 So it would seem that those that received a vaccination under the pretense of protecting others, may have accomplished the direct opposite of what they had hoped to achieve. They have become "Typhoid Mary"s of COVID-19.
Where does that leave patients that put their faith in vaccinated healthcare workers not giving them COVID-19?
What about those that got vaxxed to protect their parents or grandparents?
[edit add 10-15-23] This older and evermore relevant video:
[end edit]
