This regards the 1905 Supreme Court Jacobson decision, that has been cited ad nauseum as if suggests a legal precedent for blanket vaccine mandates.
But what Big Pharma's lackeys and their parrots don't say, is that people that were infected and thus gained natural immunity, were exempt from the mandate. In other words there is no legal precedent for what's going on in mandating these leaky, escape mutant training, mRNA COVID non-"vaccines".
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/health_law/publications/aba_health_esource/2021-2022/april-2022/eval-com/"Evaluating Compulsory Covid-19 Vaccination Mandates:
Judicial or Legislative Review is Necessary to Determine Whether Mandates Without Exceptions for Natural Immunity Should Be Allowed to Stand
Julie Parrish
"Conclusion
In defending the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ police powers to enforce compulsory vaccination under threat of criminal sanction, the Supreme Court majority in Jacobson wrote that “society based on the rule that each one is a law unto himself would soon be confronted with disorder and anarchy.” It is unlikely however, that the Jacobson court could have foreseen that by conveying such broad police powers to states in a public health emergency, states would use that power in ways that have restricted people’s ability to access employment, educational opportunities, and even healthcare.
Given the broad expanse of how police powers in Jacobson were applied to the Covid-19 pandemic, the Supreme Court should accept a case that would give the court a chance to reconsider Jacobson through a lens of strict scrutiny in light of the facts that (1) vaccines are not preventing disease transmission (compared to the smallpox vaccine, which successfully eradicated the disease) and (2) the penalty for non-compliance with vaccine mandates in the form of lost wages, pensions, college scholarships, and loss of access to public accommodations is too severe. Alternatively, if the court will not act, then state legislatures should follow the course of Florida and Utah to secure, at a minimum, protections for the 80 million Americans (and counting) who have recovered with natural immunity to Covid-19.
Nothing in the Jacobson decision shows the court contemplated that compulsory vaccination as a requisite to participate in society is an appropriate application of a state’s police power. It’s time to reconsider whether the grant of such broad authority in 1905 to compel vaccinations, particularly for the naturally-immune population, can be justified in 2022."
