[edit add 11-18-22] Retitled on 11-18-22 which if space had allowed would have been titled more like:
"Why are Big Pharma's anti-science lackeys and fellow profiteers in the FDA, CDC and NIH, like Anthony Fauci, as well as legacy media and TV white coat doctor-posers - who never treated a COVID patient - so terrified of simply engaging in discussion with world renowned doctors and scientists like like Dr. Peter McCullough (1,000 publications to his name and over 500 citations in the National Library of Medicine), Dr. Paul Marik (number 2 ranked critical care and emergency medicine doctor in the world), Dr. Joseph Varon (contributed more than 830 peer-reviewed journal articles, 10 full textbooks, and 15 dozen book chapters to medical literature), Yale School of Public Health professor of epidemiology Dr. Harvey Risch and board certified ICU pulmonary care specialist Dr. Pierre Kory, who have been in the front lines of COVID treatment as well as front row seat witnesses of vaccine injury?"Instead, Big Pharma owned bureaucrats in government continue the slaughter of Americans by ordering their lackeys in Big Tech to cancel, deplatform and censor the most qualified voices of the most successful doctors and scientists in the world.
With the expected result: Over a million Americans died horrific and completely unnecessary deaths from COVID-19 - sacrificed on the alter of Big Pharma profits - when easily over 99% of even elderly and high-risk patients could have been saved through early treatment in the comfort of their own homes, with $20 worth of generic drugs and nutraceuticals.
Doctors on 99+% Effective Treatments for COVID-19, With World Renowned $20 Remedies Compare COVID death rate in the IVM/HCQ-poor US with IVM/HCQ-rich Nations
Are the dangerous and highly experimental clot shots or hospitalization (at up to $450,000 billed per patient) a better solution than virtually 100% successful $20 early treatment at home?The reason that only Nigeria's label appeared when this screenshot was taken, is because the labels for Congo, Burundi, Chad, Madagascar, Tanzania, Niger, Camaroon, Nigeria, Ethiopia and Mali, were underneath it.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccinations-vs-covid-death-rate?time=2020-12-05..latest&country=COG~BDI~TCD~MDG~TZA~NER~CMR~NGA~ETH~MLI~USA
[end edit]
Please watch the video that was the original subject of this thread and decide for yourself whether this Big Pharma sponsored western medical holocaust was
homicide or
genocide:
COVID-19: A Second Opinion - Senate testimony overseen by Senator Ron JohnsonScroll past the dead space in the following video. It begins at the 40:19 minute mark
https://rumble.com/embed/vqjwua/?pub=4https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/watch-sen-johnsons-covid-panel-with-drs-robert-malone-peter-mccullough/Invitations were extended to Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Rochelle Walensky1:27:00 - Dr. Peter McCullough: "And I want to see a show of hands, we have roughly a hundred people in the room. How many of you in the room here yourself have had COVID-19. All right it's probably about 70% of this room. How many of you in this room, recognizing there are doctors, there are PHDs there are attorneys, media experts, other scientists, public citizens, how many of you personally have witnessed censorship, intimidation, or professional reprisal and damage as a result of your advocacy for patients? I want this to be recorded. That is 80% of this room have experienced something negative in their life in trying to promote and help compassionately, something positive for patients suffering with a potentially fatal illness."
Scroll past the dead space in the following video.
It begins at the 40:19 minute markhttps://rumble.com/embed/vqjwua/?pub=4Excerpts transcribed:Scroll to the 2:44:00 mark on Omicron affecting the vaccinated worse than non-vaccinated, while the vaccinated are the most efficient spreaders of Omicron. Watch at least through 2:53:00 on not only vaccinated being more seriously affected, but also suffering vaccine-enhanced disease along with creating escape mutants.
2:44:45 - Dr. Ryan Cole on Omicron: "This is an excellent question. We have a new virus right now - Omicron. It has nothing - if you look at your family tree and you see the funny uncle that really doesn't look like family and maybe the milkman came along somewhere, that's what Omicron is. OK, he's not on the family tree, he probably actually snuck into the family somewhere. So it doesn't branch off of the other variants. Omicron has enough mutations, the backbone of it actually looks more like a pre-Wuhan virus, from a genetic point of view. It is behaving like a common cold to the point of what doctor Urso said earlier. It doesn't bind in the lungs as the previous variants did, it doesn't cause the degree of clotting that the scary earlier variants did, we have been blessed with almost a natural vaccine. It is essentially..... now if you have had COVID and are COVID recovered you tend to get less disease with Omicron symptomologically
however, we are finding that those that have gotten the shots are getting Omicron, the vaccines are negatively affecting, meaning you are actually getting Omicron at an enhanced higher rate. Now there's a reason for this, and this is basic immunology. If you get a shot in your arm you don't have a tendency to - everybody here has got antibodies but they are a special kind in your tears, your nose and mouth called secretory IgA - its little mops in your tears. If you've had a natural infection, you have high levels of secretory IgA, these little mops in your mucosal membranes and that mops up virus quickly. The response from the vaccine you don't get this physiological path. So we are seeing, actually the vaccinated carry a high volume of virus because they don't have the secretory IgA. So this false construct from our Federal agencies, that this is a pandemic and the unvaccinated are spreading is a pathiophysiological lie. The vaccinated are carrying high volumes in their nose and tears and mouth of virus. Because the vaccine does not neutralize in that location of the body where the virus comes in. So this is very important.
This is why mandates are absolutely now moot, irrelevant, and out the window and need to go away worldwide like most of the world has done already. This is the funny uncle, this is not SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19, this is COVID-22.....meh."
3:12:30 - Ben Marble MD: "I'm Ben Marble MD I'm the founder of myfreedoctor.com.
We've delivered over 150,000 free doctor visits to America, delivering the early treatment McCullough protocol and we've only lost 4 patients, we have a 99.99% success rate. Ron Johnson: "Repeat that, so you've treated, telemedicine, 150,000 COVID patients - with your team.
Ben Marble MD: "Yes sir. We have a team of volunteer free doctors that donate their time to help treat these patients that come to us at myfreedoctor.com and they answer our questionnaires and we deliver the early treatment protocols to them as early as we can and we have a 99.99% survival rate. So I believe myfreedoctor.com with our free doctor team we have settled the science on this, early treatment works, period.
On vaccine-enhanced disease3:59:00 - Vaccinologist Dr. Robert Malone: "Regarding age stratification, I was asked not to speak about this by Nancy Pelosi's office but I had a meeting with them last fall and I specifically asked that they ask the CDC to age stratify. And there was absolutely no action taken. So it's not as if the administration and the senior leadership in the house at least, was not aware of this issue of age stratification. Point number two, the issue of the vaccines and the vaccine mandates, the data are clear,
the vaccines are not protecting from infection, replication and spread of Omicron, and the data are relatively clear and emerging, that
vaccination is enhancing the risk of infection, replication of disease and spread of Omicron."
4:02:00 - Dr. Robert Malone: "So Ontario's one example, there's multiple examples in Northern Europe, there's example of Scotland and United Kingdom, and now
I'm being asked to consult with the president of Israel tonight regarding what they're seeing now with the third jab and the fourth jab that are not helping."
4:02:14 - "So Senator Johnson you're exactly right and we call this confounding variables, and it's very difficult because there's so many overlapping things, doctor Risch can speak eloquently I'm sure about the challenges of confounding in these large data sets and we always have to be very cautious, but
what we're seeing is the risk profile is a function of the number of vaccine doses, so we're seeing increased risk with one relative to none and increased with two relative to one and with three relative to two."
4:04:50 - Vaccinologist Dr. Robert Malone: "The FDA absolutely, and my colleagues in vaccinology have long known that one of the great risks,
one of the things that scares us most as vaccinologists, is vaccine-enhanced disease. And there's a long history of vaccine-enhanced disease examples over time. Respiratory Syncytial Virus is the one that's often cited by my fellow vaccinologists, but there's many others. This is why we have to be careful in developing these vaccines as one example of why we have to be so careful and why we have to be cautious about rolling them out and that we do the science. But
in the case of vaccine-enhanced disease with corona virus vaccines this is a known complication. It's one of the reasons why I advised my group not to pursue vaccines when we got the call from Wuhan in January of 2020. Vaccine enhanced disease with corona viruses has long been a problem. It has compromised every prior corona vaccine development effort, including the veterinary ones. It's been overcome twice with veterinary vaccines and both of those are mucosal vaccines. So in short this is a known problem, many of us that are down in the trenches are carefully monitoring whether or not
there are data emerging that suggest the problem might be occurring, and now we seem to be seeing clinical data that is consistent with that. But as Dr. Risch I'm sure will share we have to be cautious because there are multiple confounding variables."
4:07:00 - Yale School of Public Health professor of epidemiology Dr. Harvey Risch: "Well no actually, the
Public Health U.K. has actually published a statement about this in their week 42 weekly report
that showed that people who've had COVID and then get vaccinated have lower levels of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies, and this means - and since the vaccines don't address the nucleocapsid antigens, they only address the spike - it means
that they're doing something that's damaging the immune response in a more general way than just what they do with the spike. And this is empirical data that Public Health U.K. has published. So we know that this is happening.
It's not theoretical issue about all of the niceties about laboratory biology and virology about things that could happen, it's a real thing that's been really observed by VaR testing."
4:08:15 - 600 peer reviewed published papers Dr. Peter McCullough: "
I want to point out that the CDC and academic medical centers say, and they will go to a home base, that they will say
that the vaccines are associated with a reduction in hospitalizations. The CDC said in the last few days there's five more papers showing the vaccines - even with Omicron - are associated with a reduction in hospitalizations.
But it's only in U.S. hospitals. Not in South Africa, not in Germany, not in Denmark, not in U.K. and not in Israel. Americans should be asking the question, "
Why are the vaccines only working against hospitalization but they don't work against binary currents of the respiratory illness or reduce spread, and they don't reduce mortality but why do they only reduce hospitalization - and by the way most hospitalizations, most studies in the United States by 85 percent. How does that happen?
That is basically academic fraud. And the reason why it is, is because these hospitals are not adjudicated. They're not telling us why the patients are hospitalized, and we've had multiple officials come out and tell us that 40-60 percent of people coming to the hospital who test positive for COVID are not there for COVID. So we have a trumped up set of numbers, and
to make matters worse our CDC has advised consistently that the unvaccinated get lots of testing and the vaccinated actually refrain from testing. So the combination of not adjudicating hospitalizations and this asymmetric testing is creating a fraudulent data scheme in order to make the claim that vaccinations are associated with reductions in hospitalizations, when in fact they're not. And that's the reason Israel is loaded with fully vaccinated people in the hospital with COVID-19 and so is Germany and so is the United Kingdom and elsewhere other than the United States." - Dr. Peter McCullough
4:10:30 - Board certified ICU pulmonologist Dr. Pierre Kory: "Yes so you know, this constant refrain that Dr. McCullough just pointed out is that everyone in the hospitals is unvaccinated. I believe that is manipulated data, and it's done again, for the same purpose that I keep talking about they want to vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate, every vaccine brings profits. Now, how do they do that?
In this country when you log into the most popular electronic health record which is probably "Epic", in numbers of hospitals throughout the pandemic,
there's only two statuses a patient can have. They can either be vaccinated or they can be unknown. There is no category of unvaccinated. It's unknown. And it is my hypothesis, I cannot prove this, I believe that if you've been vaccinated within that hospital or hospital system that vaccination record appears. If you went to a Walgreens or RiteAid or some private practice I think it's highly likely that it doesn't appear that you're vaccinated.
I believe that they are artificially with great purpose, they are hiding the fact that many people in American hospitals are vaccinated, because Dr. McCullough just talked about,
why in the United States is the data here completely discordant from other countries and other health systems which are revealing the underlying granular public health data in a transparent fashion." - Dr. Pierre Kory
4:11:50 - Dr. David Wiseman - "I have the answer here, here's a paper, I'm going to read the title of the paper "The Food and Drug Administration Biologics Effectiveness and Safety Initiative Facilitates Detection of Vaccine Administration From Unstructured Data and Medical Records Through Natural Language Processes." This is a paper from FDA that just came out in the last week or so. They say they've gone through and they say there's at least a 16% non-capture of people who were vaccinated but are being called non-vaccinated. That is exactly what you are saying and the FDA admitting it. Here's the paper it's right over here. This is on the top of my list. What are the consequences of that?
That means that all the data where they have got vaccinated here and unvaccinated there 16% are in the wrong place, that means you've got a 32% imbalance and swing in the wrong way. FDA has just admitted that."
4:12:50 - Dr. Pierre Kory:
"I want to make one more point, that I am absolutely exhausted about hearing about vaccinated and unvaccinated. There's only one category we need to care about. It's untreated verses treated. Stop with the vaccinations."5:05:00 mark - Dr. Peter McCullough: "
There are great unknowns with respect to the vaccines, their mechanism of action and disease categories like cancer but there is a disease category upon which the FDA, the CDC and all stakeholders agree that the vaccines cause, and that's myocarditis, it's a heart inflammation. Now I will tell you as a cardiologist it is crystal clear that these vaccines cause myocarditis. Doctor Parks is already quoted in the paper by Ovolio that has shown beyond the shadow of a doubt that vaccines cause myocarditis.
The FDA indicates for Pfizer Moderna that they cause myocarditis. We now have over 200 papers in the peer-reviewed literature on myocarditis, sadly showing the rates of myocarditis are far in excess of what the CDC ever imagined, we've identified that boys have a predilection for this far more than girls and the maximum age group -
the peak age group is age 18 to 24 so it's actually the college age - the risk extends up to age 50 and I can tell you that in this age group it is clear the risk of the vaccines are far greater than the risks of COVID-19 the respiratory illness, two papers one by Tracy Hoag at UC Davis one by Ron Kostaff that these papers have been presented at the FDA meetings, they have not been challenged as analyses, one and there are now fatal cases of myocarditis published by Washington University in St. Louis Verma and by Troy from South Korea, more fatal cases accrue there is the father of a boy here in this room who's died of myocarditis. One death is too many. One. We have 21,000 cases of myocarditis and climbing in the United States that the CDC has verified. One was too many.
Under no circumstances, under any circumstances, should a young person ever receive one of these vaccines, let alone ever be pressured to receive the vaccine, let alone ever to be mandated to take the vaccine. This is crystal clear. The FDA agrees. There can be no controversy over this. There can be no normalizing of it. To say that it's "mild" or that it's transitory....."
Senator Ron Johnson: "So talk about that. Is myocarditis mild?"
Dr. Peter McCullough: "I'm telling you as a specialist myocarditis is not mild. There are papers by Shower and now by Trong at University of Utah Salt Lake,
when they do MRI on these individuals who are suspected of myocarditis, 100% are having heart damage. 100%. We have a paper by Teshopi and colleagues looking at the outcome of individuals prior to COVID in this age group with myocarditis,
13% will have permanent heart injury. 32% never actually never get up to normal. They don't get back to normal.
We are seeing unprecedented numbers of athletes dying on the field in Europe. Unprecedented. Of these cardiac arrests, half of them don't come back. We now have a report out of the heart group in the UK where actuarial mortality for those under age 15, mortality in the UK, is higher than expected."
[video added by admin:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wZP8rgSfbekz/ ]
Johnson: "What concerns me so much about the whistleblower report there, is, this is the only vaccine injury that the CDC, FDA are acknowledging and you combine that with the fact that there's at least suspicions that the Defense Department is doctoring the data, in their database, affecting myocarditis. I'm sorry, that gets my suspicion antenna.....
McCullough: "And the recommendations, and the mandates, are ignoring the FDA warnings!"
Leigh Dundas (human rights attorney):: "I would contend Senator that there's not just a suspicion.
In August when the report was run on acute myocarditis in the DOD website there were 1,239 cases and now when you run it it's down to 307. In January of 2022 there were 176 cases and magically they are now down to 17. There is a word for that and it's not "suspicious". We have in the military the single best database that exists, because we have baselines in that and acute disease across all categories in the preceding years - 5 years - leading up to the vaccination year was 1.7 million.
They introduced and mandated a COVID-19 vaccine for our U.S. military when they have only lost 12 service members total to the disease. And in the 10 months of 2021 after that it jumped from 1.7 million all diseases to darn near 22 million. That was a 20 million increase. We need to not be calling this suspicious, with all due respect, we need to be asking hard questions of the DOD and I will close by saying they are charged at least in part with protecting the sanctity and welfare of the brave men and women who are defending this country and right now these numbers indicate that something is drastically wrong and I know of only one reason that databases roll math backwards."
5:12:40 - "OK so on the day in which the Pfizer vaccine was authorized, under regulatory law, that data had to be made public to the American people. By data I mean the clinical trials data that Pfizer submits to the FDA, that the FDA then reviews and decides whether or not we're going to give....
Johnson: "And why wasn't it? Was there a waiver granted by FDA?"
"No, no what they said was (effectively) "You know we have a lot of FOIA requests..." and they didn't deny that they had to release it eventually because that would have obviously contradicted Federal law, so what they said instead was like "You know even though we have a budget of like 6 billion dollars - I think it is - we only have a handful of employees to handle these FOIA requests and you know they have to make a lot of photocopies....."
Johnson: "Now a judge has ordered this information within 8 months...."
That is, instead of the FDA's request to release data by 2076. (
The Pfizer-owned FDA through regulatory capture)
COVID-19: A Second Opinion - Senate testimony overseen by Senator Ron Johnsonhttps://rumble.com/embed/vqjwua/?pub=4
