UK HSA COVID vaxx omicron-efficacy <50% at 3 month, 0% at 5 month, then negative

[admin]

U.K. Health Security Agency COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 35 shows astonishingly pitiful performance of vaccine and booster efficacy against omicron dropping under 50% at 3 months and 0% at 5 months followed by negative efficacy. In other words after 5 months a vaxxed person would on average have a worse outcome from omicron than an unvaxxed person.

So a question some might ask is should they let their vaccine's efficacy drop below 50% and get a new jab every 3 months, or should they wait 5 months until the efficacy drops to zero and then reload?

Unfortunately it's not that simple since according to data pointed out by Dr. Robert Malone, inventor and patent holder in the mRNA vaccine technology platform, the risk of a vaccine adverse event increases with each successive dose.
".....what we're seeing is the risk profile is a function of the number of vaccine doses, so we're seeing increased risk with one relative to none and increased with two relative to one and with three relative to two."
COVID-19: A Second Opinion - Senate testimony

But what if a person gets infected during the low efficacy period of the rapidly waning clot shot?
Is it reasonable to assume that a lot of deaths of the vaccinated are the result of folks falsely believing they are protected, and thus don't bother to plan with their doctor and prepare ahead with generic drugs and nutraceuticals, for the event of infection by COVID?
EVERYBODY needs to prepare their immune systems in advance of infection, and their medicine cabinets and/or plan for the event of infection.
NSW: 798 COVID deaths in the last 8 weeks, all but 2 were vaccinated

Let alone that it has become apparent that the more toxic spike proteins a person receives from the clot shots, the worse the damage to the immune system becomes.

mRNA vaxx - functional reprogramming of innate immune responses- favoring cancer

Vaccinated Die Because of Vax-induced Autoimmune Attacks on Their Own Organs

Fifth-largest U.S. life insurer reports 163% rise in 2021 death-benefit payouts

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1101870/vaccine-surveillance-report-week-35.pdf

[admin]

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-vaccines-must-be

"New studies show that the COVID vaccines damage your immune system, likely permanently
The vaccines are making it more likely you'll be infected with Omicron 90 days after you are fully vaccinated. To keep vaccine effectiveness high against omicron, vaccination every 30 days is needed.

Update Jan 7, 2022: The numbers in the Denmark study described below are now confirmed by government data from Germany showing that vaccinated people are 8X more likely to develop Omicron than unvaccinated people. This is not surprising since a paper from Germany showed the same thing: the more you vaccinate, the worse it gets.

Worried about Omicron? Guess what? After 90 days, the vaccine they gave you is going to make you MORE likely to get infected from Omicron, not less. The longer you stay on the vaccine treadmill, the harder to get off in the future and the easier you’ll make it for the virus.

In short, we’ve been lied to about the vaccine. It is protecting you less and less over time. While you may get a benefit for earlier variants, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to be negative. In short, you are getting a short term benefit against Delta, but at the expense of a degradation of your overall immunity to everything else.

These vaccines may help you win the war against a variant that may soon be rare, but the price you pay is that you make your immunity to everything else worse. It’s a dumb tradeoff (especially since early treatments work so well). But the people making the laws won’t believe any of the science referenced in this article, so it will continue.

Alix Mayer alerted me to this game changing tweet about a study in Denmark which instantly went viral as you can see from the number of retweets:"
more:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-vaccines-must-be

"What the paper said in detail

First, the link in the tweet is to the outdated version of the paper. The current version can be found here.

Start at the comments, both from social media and also from medrxiv readers.

Check out the social media portion of the comments

Here are some comments (on old and new version of the paper):

    So assume the results you like (high VE for recent vaccination) are causal, but hand wave confounders at results you don't like (negative VE for distant vaccination)? Science?

    This is a superb paper, especially the careful approach to CNV calling and the Bayesian methods used throughout.

    Looking at the graphs, I see both vaccines lose all effectiveness at 90 days, but worse, actually drop into strong negative effectiveness after that time.

    This would mean that these vaccines *increase* one's chances of infection after the initial 90 days "honeymoon" period.

    Am I getting this right?

    If so, why are governments pushing third doses as Omicron is becoming dominant?

The key material is in the full PDF:



The graphs above tell the story. Negative VE means the vaccine is helping the virus, not you.

So at 60 days, the protection is close to zero, so if you want to maintain protection, getting vaccinated every 30 days is required.

This isn’t a vaccine at all. This is basically stimulating your immune system so it is already “geared up” to fight the virus. That’s not what a vaccine is supposed to do.

Furthermore, the negative VE after 90 days means you are hooked for life and I would guess (based on the mechanism of action), that we will need shorter and shorter dosing intervals for every booster you get (since it kills off your immune system every time).

So it could very well be monthly boosters after the 2nd dose, weekly boosters after the 3rd dose, and perhaps daily boosters after the 4th dose to maintain your “immunity.”

You can’t stop after that because if you stop, you’re in worse shape than if you never started.
The stunning conclusion of the paper

    In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.

All I can say is “wow.” The people who wrote this paper are clearly drinking the Kool-Aid on their interpretation of what their study means.

They also wrote this (which is purely speculative with no data behind it as noted in the italics were my addition):

    The negative estimates in the final period arguably suggest different behaviour and/or exposure patterns in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE. This was likely the result of Omicron spreading rapidly initially through single (super-spreading) events causing many infections among young, vaccinated individuals.

This paper should be a wake up call: the vaccines do not work. Stop repeating the insanity.

Early treatments like the Fareed and Tyson protocol are 10X better than any new therapy, they don’t “hook you,” and they don’t cause disability or death.

If doctors started prescribing the Fareed and Tyson protocol, we’d have virtually no deaths, and few hospitalizations. But they can’t do that since medical board will take away the licenses of any physicians who prescribe ivermectin, etc. This is happening now.

We are in this mess because the NIH, CDC, FDA are corrupt and incompetent and they will not hold themselves accountable in an open debate. This has been going on for 20 years in the vaccine space… it’s nothing new. The book “Evidence of harm” documents all of this. Kirby was deliberately neutral in his presentation (being non-judgmental like reporters are supposed to be), but any neutral thinking person will side against the authorities.
Why the paper went viral

So, the reason this paper went viral is because

    It is well done,

    It was done by PhDs in infectious disease and epidemiology,

    The results show what is really happening, and

    Nobody has been able to attack the paper with a credible argument, even on Twitter.

    It confirms what my team of experts has been saying about negative VE

Here are some of the ridiculous attempts to discredit the paper:

click here for more:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/i/45986919/what-the-paper-said-in-detail

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/reuters-fact-check-of-the-denmark

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/negative-vaccine-efficacy-example

[admin]

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/negative-vaccine-efficacy---dr-paul-alexander-sounds-the-alarm/article_2226ec36-aeb6-11ec-8772-03a7ae44197e.html

"Negative Vaccine Efficacy - Dr. Paul Alexander sounds the alarm
    by Justus R. Hope, MD Mar 28, 2022 Updated Apr 14, 2022



Negative Efficacy is doctor-speak for a disease-promoting effect in a drug. In the case of a vaccine, Negative Efficacy means the vaccinated person is more likely to get infected than the unvaccinated.

In the real world, whenever we see the phrase Negative Efficacy associated with an experimental drug, it usually means the chance of death, infection, or serious disease is higher with the drug than without, and the term Negative Efficacy is used.

If one were testing a new pill to treat brain cancer, and more of the patients died who received the drug, two things should occur; one, the medication would have a Negative Efficacy, and two, it should not be approved.

Negative Efficacy is often associated with increased all-cause mortality. That means more people die in the drug-taking group, whether due to brain cancer or other reasons. So no one would want to be part of that group.

The United Kingdom Government Health Security Agency [UKHSA] reported Negative Efficacy in those COVID-19 vaccinated patients versus those who remain unvaccinated.

Based upon the weekly reports published by the UKHSA for Week 11, 2022, vaccine effectiveness against Omicron in the 60 to 69 age group reached nearly NEGATIVE 300% meaning it was almost four times more likely for a triple-vaxxed person to get infected compared to an unvaxxed.

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/03/20/vaccine-effectiveness-hits-as-low-as-minus-300-as-ukhsa-announces-it-will-no-longer-publish-the-data/

UKHSA announced that as of April 1, 2022, they would stop testing and keeping track of these numbers that apparently do no one any good, especially those who have been vaccinated and the vaccine manufacturers. It causes worry in the vaccinated, and it contradicts what we have all been told, that the vaccine is effective.

What's worse is that hospitalizations and deaths also show a similar Negative Efficacy with more death and severe disease among the vaccinated, the opposite of the expected effect.

In the illustration above, reflecting the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report of Week 8 in 2022, one can surmise that more than 70% of COVID infections and hospitalizations were in the vaccinated, while more than 85% of the deaths were in the vaccinated.

https://gettr.com/comment/cufb796904

Dr. Paul Alexander, Assistant Professor at McMaster University and a former COVID White House Advisor wrote about the UK data and revelation of Negative Vaccine Efficacy.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1045329/Vaccine_surveillance_report_week_1_2022.pdf

In his recent Substack, he noted, "In plain language, taking the vaccine escalates your risk of getting infected –Negative Efficacy. This is bad as the evidence is clear that these vaccines are non-sterilizing in that they do not stop infection, transmission, death, or hospitalization. IMO, they never ever worked. I will debate anyone on this."

https://palexander.substack.com/p/uk-health-security-agency-first-covid?s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Dr. Alexander discusses another example of Negative Vaccine Efficacy with the Dengue Vaccine that killed many children in the Philippines in 2017. Like the COVID-19 shots, this vaccine should never have been used. Since Dr. Alexander has spoken out, what has been the response of those in the vaccine industry?

Alexander reports they contacted him. He was offered $1 million and $50,000 a month if he would stop writing pieces that were critical of Pfizer's vaccine and CEO, Albert Bourla.

Dr. Alexander – not so politely – declined.

https://www.drpaulalexander.com/blogs/news/pfizer-offered-me-1-million-50-000-month-wage-essentially-to-stop-writing-hammering-them-bourla-i-have-had-limited-patchy-broken-income-due-to-being-cancelled-smeared-i-said-no

Today, the repercussions of Negative Vaccine Efficacy with the COVID vaccines show massively increased all-cause mortality numbers reported by Life Insurance Companies, the first reported on by OneAmerica's CEO, Scott Davison.

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/life-insurance-deaths-up-40---dr-robert-malone-s-chilling-analysis/article_d24bccac-6f38-11ec-912f-1f6d8fc5fac4.html

Edward Dowd has captured the crest of this wave of death sweeping around the globe. He has evidence that fraud occurred with the manufacturers knowingly concealing their knowledge of Negative Efficacy in their internal data that has been hidden from the public and is only now coming to light.

https://gettr.com/post/p120pa3d8e6

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/pfizer-moderna-investors-run-for-the-exits/article_f33832ce-9347-11ec-830c-6fe60d1a126b.html

Dowd's analysis suggests upwards of 61,000 excess deaths due to vaccine Negative Efficacy in the Millennial age group alone. "That’s a Vietnam War," says Dowd.

https://gettr.com/post/p10m8zzab41

https://gettr.com/post/p10zdlt52a4

But the excess deaths are showing up in almost all age cohorts and cannot be explained away by other causes. Dowd refers to this as the 'greatest fraud' in modern history.

https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/wall-street-analyst-covid-vaccines-greatest-fraud-in-history/

When one realizes the implications of Negative Vaccine Efficacy and the ensuing increase in deaths, manifesting as 'excess deaths, ' one cannot escape the sheer numbers we may witness in the coming months and years. For example, consider that 11.2 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been administered.

Then, realize that 4.52 billion souls are fully vaccinated, representing 57.9% of the Earth's population - according to the latest figures. If you factor in that excess deaths from Negative Vaccine Efficacy are running at 40% ABOVE the expected numbers, we are looking at massive increases in hospitalizations and disease for the near future.

Our World in Data

On February 8, 2022, Wall Street saw Pfizer and Moderna lose a collective $28 billion in market value when they hinted that mRNA vaccine sales might slump.

Moderna has already seen its share prices dip by some 70% from the peak, and Dowd is convinced once the evidence of hidden deaths, Negative Efficacy, and fraud surfaces, both stocks will crater.

"Fraud eviscerates all contracts," explains Dowd, and the immunity from lawsuits will disappear once fraud is proven.

Dowd advises that we should not be left 'holding the bag' when the fraud is discovered. That means not owning these stocks on the way down as they crater and their corporations get bankrupted with lawsuits.

For the moment, it is business as usual for Pfizer and Moderna. However, as the word gets out past the censors, the silencers, and the bribers, as it slowly is doing now, it is only a matter of time until the truth becomes evident to everyone.

As Dowd says, "You can't hide the bodies, and the bodies are piling up."

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/pfizer-moderna-investors-run-for-the-exits/article_f33832ce-9347-11ec-830c-6fe60d1a126b.html

My practice has witnessed this. Since the vaccine rollout, patients are coming down with heart attacks, aggressive cancers, and deaths in explosive numbers. My book on Cancer and Repurposed Drugs has garnered increased attention partly because of this rise.

https://www.amazon.com/Surviving-Cancer-COVID-19-Disease-Repurposed/dp/0998055409

So, I suppose we may continue to see offers of $1 million and $50,000 per month to pay off people who are bad for the vaccine business. Many, if not most, would give in to such a temptation. However, Edward Dowd and Paul Alexander cannot be bought for any price, and they are hell-bent on getting the truth out. They are bound and determined to save humanity regardless of any cost to themselves.

I wrote about this same determination in physicians like Tess Lawrie, the Conscience of Medicine, who so aptly chastised a guilt-ridden Andrew Hill for giving in to the corruption. In this Oracle Films documentary, the actual footage of Tess Lawrie’s Zoom call with Andrew Hill can be viewed.  Hill is seen looking away from the camera as Lawrie confronts his cowardice. As she remarks, “I don’t know how you sleep at night,” all Hill can do is muster a feigned smile [13:09].

https://rumble.com/embed/vttc85/?pub=4

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/dr-tess-lawrie-the-conscience-of-medicine/article_ff673eca-ac2d-11eb-adaa-ab952b1d2661.html

https://www.amazon.com/Ivermectin-World-Justus-R-Hope/dp/1737415909

Tess Lawrie is a moral giant and at the risk of financial devastation, placed our interests above her own. Please join me in supporting her new Substack as a paid subscriber. That is the least we can all do to reward those who say no to bribes.

https://substack.com/profile/80297209-dr-tess-lawrie-mbbch-phd

Join Dr. Alexander’s Substack as well. Those who say no to Pfizer or Moderna, when they could have accepted millions in easy money but chose to do the right thing, are people we must support in any way we can.

https://substack.com/profile/58916651-dr-paul-alexander

Dr. Andrew Hill made the wrong choice, which will forever haunt him. However, people like Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Tess Lawrie, Dr. Paul Alexander, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. George Fareed, Dr. Brian Tyson, Dr. Harvey Risch, Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and Dr. Scott Jensen all made the correct decision. They chose God and Humanity over evil and profits.

We cannot allow any more deaths to occur, and we cannot allow more people to ‘hold the bag’ as Edward Dowd advises. Dowd has dedicated his life to exposing the vaccine fraud.

The true bag holders are those who have already departed, those souls who took the government and vaccine officials at their word, and who are no longer breathing. We owe it to them to hold the culprits accountable.

We owe it to them to stop this genocide now. Finally, we owe it to our children to stand up and say , "This stops NOW and with us." We do this by continuing to speak out and calling out the truth to our fellow citizens. Everyone must awaken and become aware of what is happening.

Dr. Robert Malone said it best, "This means for all of us, that in this exceptional situation we should quite simply, keep the peace, consistently expose all the lies, and show people bit by bit, why, and by whom, they are being deceived.

When we do that, and in doing so reflect on the strength of our arguments, then we can not only solve the current problem, but possibly, achieve something much bigger, namely, use one of the deepest crises of humanity to turn around the direction of human history, and so, open the door to a new (and better) era."

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/uncovering-the-corona-narrative?s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

[admin]

bump