To date the most prominent is the one that Zelenko and his colleagues put together that is undergoing peer review:
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=53.0There is one published in the New England Journal of Medicine that would seem another designed-to-fail "effort", this one looking at HCQ as a prophylaxis, done by 24 doctors and medical professionals on healthy individuals in a ridiculously misguided effort to falsely portray HCQ as being ineffective as a prophylaxis. Are we really to believe that those 24 medical professionals had no idea that it takes weeks to get established as every person that has taken it to travel to any country with malaria has learned? Just another typical "study" out to demonize HCQ:
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=154.0The reason most trials have only been done on very sick hospitalized patients would seem to be that they are designed to fail, because once a the cytokine storm has taken over the patient, when it's a bit late to expect antivirals to have a great effect.
Yet even with hospital inpatient trials, the ones that administered HCQ within the first 24 to 48 hours, still saw a 50% reduction in mortality.
Many of these trials are obviously done to demonize the most effective treatment protocol to date, that only costs $20, to stall until such a time as a Big Pharma patented medication can be peddled in its place (like relatively ineffective Remdesivir at $3200 by comparison). Any replacement would almost necessarily have to be less effective, than the 99+% recovery rate of HCQ+zinc+azithromycin, when administered within the first 5 days of infection.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=120.0
