Did the FDA have grounds to offer emergency use authorization (EUA) to COVID-19 vaccines?
It would seem no more so than it did when it gave EUA to
Gilead's remdesivir/Velkury, since hydroxychloroquine was already in wide use at the time and had proven itself to be
up to 100% effective in EARLY treatment of COVID-19, while in trials Remdesivir had shown it did not result in a statistically significant reduction in mortality from COVID-19.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=276.0The vaccine EUAs were based on
the over 10-1/2 month old (as of 2-11-21)
BIG LIE that "
there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives":
_________________________________________
https://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/recipients/faq#emergency-auth"
What is an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and why was it granted?The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has made the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine available under an emergency access mechanism called an EUA. The EUA is supported by a Secretary of Health and Human Services declaration that circumstances exist to justify the emergency use of drugs and biological products during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine has not undergone the same type of review as an FDA-approved or cleared product.
FDA may issue an EUA when certain criteria are met, which includes that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. In addition, the FDA decision is based on the totality of the scientific evidence available showing that the product may be effective to prevent COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic and that the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential risks of the product.
All of these criteria must be met to allow for the product to be used during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The EUA for the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is in effect for the duration of the COVID-19 EUA declaration justifying emergency use of these products, unless terminated or revoked (after which the products may no longer be used)."
__________________________________________
So the "FDA may issue an EUA
when certain criteria are met, which includes that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives."
As a preventative/prophylaxis Dr. Pierre Kory found from drug trials of this 30 year
approved alternative:
"If you are taking Ivermectin you will not contract COVID-19. I repeat, if you are taking Ivermectin you will not contract COVID-19."https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=461.0Was that criteria met since there has been an up to 99-100% effective prophylaxis as well as up to 100% effective EARLY treatment protocols for COVID-19, the efficacy of which was proven as early as
March 24th of 2020 when Dr. Vladimir Zelenko wrote an open letter and uploaded a video on YouTube declaring the results of his
100% success rate in treating 350 elderly and high-risk patients with zero deaths and zero hospitalizations with his "Zelenko Protocol", which employed off-label use of hydroxychloroquine plus zinc and azithromycin, two safe drugs of which have been
approved for over 65 and 40 years respectively and are taken by millions of Americans every day of the year for Lupus and RA in the same dosage that the Zelenko Protocol prescribes over just 7 days.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=18.0https://newsthud.com/ny-doctor-successfully-treats-patients-with-drug-cocktail-zero-deaths-zero-hospitalizations-zero-intubations/Indeed at least two such protocols offer approved alternatives, and in the case of ivermectin ever since April of 2020. Ivermectin is a safe, Nobel Prize winning drug, has been
approved for 35 years with billions of doses having been taken, that is one of the safest drugs on the planet, that demonstrates tremendous efficacy in curing COVID-19. Indeed the WHO suggests that mass treatment is an underutilized strategy for this drug (as clearly demonstrated by the graph below of mass treatment in the 8 Peruvian states).
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?board=3.0So it would seem the EUA was issued on a fraudulent basis, since there have been sound therapeutics
that have approved for decades, that have been curing COVID-19 ever since February/March of 2020?
This is the same lie the FDA used to grant EUA to Gilead's $3,100-$5,700 remdesivir/Veklury, which the NIH and WHO had established
did not result in a statistically significant reduction in mortality, while EUA was taken away from (
$4.76 per COVID course) hydroxychloroquine which had already been demonstrated to be safe and up to 99-100% effective in early treatment of COVID-19.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=276Like Zelenko, Dr. Brian Tyson treated 1900 patients with zero deaths and only one brief hospitalization of 4 days.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=359.0The effectiveness of ivermectin has also been demonstrated beyond the shadow of a doubt over millions of people through mass treatment in Peru and many other countries:
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=622.0
How many other diseases, of any nature whatsoever, do we have TWO up to 99-100% effective treatment protocols available for (that cost $3.50 per course of treatment for HCQ part), that employ incredibly safe drugs that have been approved for 65 and 35 years, that have been widely used around the world for so many decades? 
