Should we be calling it the Wuhan Flu, CCP flu, Carolina Flu or the Fauci Flu?

[admin]

[edit add 5-30-23] https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/1661698114917646336
or https://rumble.com/v2qm8ne-dr.-david-martin-fact-covid-19-was-biological-warfare-on-the-human-race.html

"A biological weapons facility at the University of Carolina Chapel Hill received an exemption from the gain of function moratorium, so that by 2016 we could publish the Journal article that said "SARS corona virus is poised for human emergence. In 2016. And what was the corona virus poised for human emergence? It was WIV-1. Wuhan Institute of Virology virus 1. Poised for human emergence in 2016. At the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Such that by the time we get to 2017 and 2018 the following phrase entered into common parlance among the community: 'There is going to be an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen'. Then operative word obviously in that phrase, the word 'release'"
(much more in video here)
"It was in September of 2019 that we were informed, that the world is going to have an intentional release of a respiratory pathogen so that by September 2020 there would be a worldwide acceptance of a universal vaccine template."
"And the intent was to use corona virus to get there."
"'Until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at the emergency threshold that is often largely ignored, to sustain the funding base beyond the crisis he said we need to increase the public understanding for the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or a pan corona virus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issue, investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.'"
"This was premeditated domestic terrorism, stated at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2015. Published in front of them. This is an act of biological and chemical warfare perpetrated on the human race and it was admitted to in writing, that this was a financial heist and a financial fraud 'investors will follow if they see profit at the end of the process.'"
https://rumble.com/v2qm8ne-dr.-david-martin-fact-covid-19-was-biological-warfare-on-the-human-race.html
All Pfizer vaccines for SARS corona viruses have failed since 1990. [end edit]

[Edit add 5-26-21 for Carolina connection] "Dangerous research - Researchers at the Wuhan Institute were led by China’s leading expert on bat viruses, Dr. Shi Zheng-li. Shi teamed up with Ralph S. Baric from the University of North Carolina who pioneered techniques for genetically manipulating these viruses, which became a major aspect of research at the Wuhan Institute.6 Their work focused on enhancing the ability of bat viruses to attack humans so as to “examine the emergence potential.”1
In 2015,they created a novel virus by taking the backbone of the SARS virus replacing its spike protein with one from another bat virus known as SHC014-CoV. This manufactured virus was able to infect a lab culture of cells from the human airways. They wrote that scientific review panels might deem their research too risky to pursue but argued that it had the potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks. However, the value of gain-of-function studies in preventing the COVID-19 pandemic was negative, as this research highly likely created the pandemic.
On 9 December 2019, just before the outbreak of the pandemic, Daszak gave an interview in which he talked in glowing terms of how his researchers at the Wuhan Institute had created over 100 new SARS-related coronaviruses, some of which could get into human cells and could cause untreatable SARS disease in humanized mice."
Much more
https://www.scientificfreedom.dk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Made-in-China-the-coronavirus-that-killed-millions-of-people.pdf [end edit]

[edit add 10-19-21] "Covid-19 and the Global Predators: We are the Prey"
https://www.wearetheprey.com
Excerpt:  Page 59
"Working together, Dr. Baric and a large team of Chinese have developed a SARS-CoV virus that is probably the deadliest we have documented. It causes an inflammation of the brain (encephalitis) that kills Franken-mice who have implanted human receptors for the virus." [end edit]
____________________________________

Could the blame for this pandemic ultimately be laid at the feet of Dr. Anthony Fauci?

Now the article:

As always best read at the link.
https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-backed-controversial-wuhan-lab-millions-us-dollars-risky-coronavirus-research-1500741

Dr. Fauci Backed Controversial Wuhan Lab with U.S. Dollars for Risky Coronavirus Research
By Fred Guterl On 4/28/20 at 2:57 PM EDT

Dr. Anthony Fauci is an adviser to President Donald Trump and something of an American folk hero for his steady, calm leadership during the pandemic crisis. At least one poll shows that Americans trust Fauci more than Trump on the coronavirus pandemic—and few scientists are portrayed on TV by Brad Pitt.

But just last year, the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the organization led by Dr. Fauci, funded scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other institutions for work on gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses.

In 2019, with the backing of NIAID, the National Institutes of Health committed $3.7 million over six years for research that included some gain-of-function work. The program followed another $3.7 million, 5-year project for collecting and studying bat coronaviruses, which ended in 2019, bringing the total to $7.4 million.

Many scientists have criticized gain of function research, which involves manipulating viruses in the lab to explore their potential for infecting humans, because it creates a risk of starting a pandemic from accidental release.

SARS-CoV-2 , the virus now causing a global pandemic, is believed to have originated in bats. U.S. intelligence, after originally asserting that the coronavirus had occurred naturally, conceded last month that the pandemic may have originated in a leak from the Wuhan lab. (At this point most scientists say it's possible—but not likely—that the pandemic virus was engineered or manipulated.)

Dr. Fauci did not respond to Newsweek's requests for comment. NIH responded with a statement that said in part: "Most emerging human viruses come from wildlife, and these represent a significant threat to public health and biosecurity in the US and globally, as demonstrated by the SARS epidemic of 2002-03, and the current COVID-19 pandemic.... scientific research indicates that there is no evidence that suggests the virus was created in a laboratory."

The Controversial Experiments and Wuhan Lab Suspected of Starting Pandemic
Read more

The NIH research consisted of two parts. The first part began in 2014 and involved surveillance of bat coronaviruses, and had a budget of $3.7 million. The program funded Shi Zheng-Li, a virologist at the Wuhan lab, and other researchers to investigate and catalogue bat coronaviruses in the wild. This part of the project was completed in 2019.

A second phase of the project, beginning that year, included additional surveillance work but also gain-of-function research for the purpose of understanding how bat coronaviruses could mutate to attack humans. The project was run by EcoHealth Alliance, a non-profit research group, under the direction of President Peter Daszak, an expert on disease ecology. NIH canceled the project just this past Friday, April 24th, Politico reported. Daszak did not immediately respond to Newsweek requests for comment.

The project proposal states: "We will use S protein sequence data, infectious clone technology, in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that % divergence thresholds in S protein sequences predict spillover potential."

In layman's terms, "spillover potential" refers to the ability of a virus to jump from animals to humans, which requires that the virus be able to attach to receptors in the cells of humans. SARS-CoV-2, for instance, is adept at binding to the ACE2 receptor in human lungs and other organs.

According to Richard Ebright, an infectious disease expert at Rutgers University, the project description refers to experiments that would enhance the ability of bat coronavirus to infect human cells and laboratory animals using techniques of genetic engineering. In the wake of the pandemic, that is a noteworthy detail.

Ebright, along with many other scientists, has been a vocal opponent of gain-of-function research because of the risk it presents of creating a pandemic through accidental release from a lab.

Dr. Fauci is renowned for his work on the HIV/AIDS crisis in the 1990s. Born in Brooklyn, he graduated first in his class from Cornell University Medical College in 1966. As head of NIAID since 1984, he has served as an adviser to every U.S. president since Ronald Reagan.

A decade ago, during a controversy over gain-of-function research on bird-flu viruses, Dr. Fauci played an important role in promoting the work. He argued that the research was worth the risk it entailed because it enables scientists to make preparations, such as investigating possible anti-viral medications, that could be useful if and when a pandemic occurred.

The work in question was a type of gain-of-function research that involved taking wild viruses and passing them through live animals until they mutate into a form that could pose a pandemic threat. Scientists used it to take a virus that was poorly transmitted among humans and make it into one that was highly transmissible—a hallmark of a pandemic virus. This work was done by infecting a series of ferrets, allowing the virus to mutate until a ferret that hadn't been deliberately infected contracted the disease.

The work entailed risks that worried even seasoned researchers. More than 200 scientists called for the work to be halted. The problem, they said, is that it increased the likelihood that a pandemic would occur through a laboratory accident.

Dr. Fauci defended the work. "Determining the molecular Achilles' heel of these viruses can allow scientists to identify novel antiviral drug targets that could be used to prevent infection in those at risk or to better treat those who become infected," wrote Fauci and two co-authors in the Washington Post on December 30, 2011. "Decades of experience tells us that disseminating information gained through biomedical research to legitimate scientists and health officials provides a critical foundation for generating appropriate countermeasures and, ultimately, protecting the public health."

Nevertheless, in 2014, under pressure from the Obama administration, the National of Institutes of Health instituted a moratorium on the work, suspending 21 studies.

Three years later, though—in December 2017—the NIH ended the moratorium and the second phase of the NIAID project, which included the gain-of-function research, began. The NIH established a framework for determining how the research would go forward: scientists have to get approval from a panel of experts, who would decide whether the risks were justified.

The reviews were indeed conducted—but in secret, for which the NIH has drawn criticism. In early 2019, after a reporter for Science magazine discovered that the NIH had approved two influenza research projects that used gain of function methods, scientists who oppose this kind of research excoriated the NIH in an editorial in the Washington Post.

"We have serious doubts about whether these experiments should be conducted at all," wrote Tom Inglesby of Johns Hopkins University and Marc Lipsitch of Harvard. "[W]ith deliberations kept behind closed doors, none of us will have the opportunity to understand how the government arrived at these decisions or to judge the rigor and integrity of that process."

Correction 5/5, 6:20 p.m.: The headline of this story has been corrected to reflect that the Wuhan lab received only a part of the millions of U.S. dollars allocated for virus research.

https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-backed-controversial-wuhan-lab-millions-us-dollars-risky-coronavirus-research-1500741
_____________________________________

[edit add 7-22-21] Tucker Carlson Today - Dr. Li Meng Yan - June 30, 2021

[end edit]
_____________________________________

added 7-17-21

After YouTube bans the video in the player below you can view it at BitChute on this link:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ppdn3gqXOSDm/

[admin]

A deep dive that ties this all together in video form.

A much deeper and broader dive in video form.

[admin]

[admin]

Robert F Kennedy discusses the Fauci/Wuhan connection.
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/05/10/is-there-a-vaccine-for-coronavirus.aspx

[admin]

All Signs Now Point to Wuhan Biolab After Damning US Intel Report Surfaces
https://www.westernjournal.com/signs-now-point-wuhan-biolab-damning-us-intel-report-surfaces/?ff_source=facebook&ff_medium=westernjournalism&ff_campaign=manualpost&ff_content=2021-05-20

"A new report says three researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China were so sick in November 2019 that they required hospitalization.

The report Sunday in The Wall Street Journal said it was based upon “a previously undisclosed U.S. intelligence report.”

Although the report said there was no consensus about the veracity of evidence underlying the assessment among “[c]urrent and former officials familiar with the intelligence,” one was quoted as saying, “The information that we had coming from the various sources was of exquisite quality. It was very precise. What it didn’t tell you was exactly why they got sick.”

The month in question is when experts believe the coronavirus first appeared in Wuhan. The first documented case of a person getting the virus took place on Dec. 8, 2019.

China has pushed the theory that the virus leaped to humans after being transmitted through bats or other animals via a “wet market.”

Chinese officials trashed the new report. According to CNN, Yuan Zhiming, director of the Wuhan National Biosafety Lab, a part of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, said on Monday, “I’ve read it, it’s a complete lie.”

“Those claims are groundless,” he said. “The lab has not been aware of this situation, and I don’t even know where such information came from.”

Zhao Lijian, a spokesman for China’s Foreign Ministry, said the U.S. was “hyping up the lab leak theory.”

“Through field visits and in-depth visits in China, the experts unanimously agreed that the allegation of lab leaking is extremely unlikely,” Zhao said.

A State Department fact sheet issued in the final days of the Trump administration had indicated that the researchers’ illness should be a point of investigation.

“The U.S. government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was ‘zero infection’ among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses,” the Jan. 15 fact sheet said.

“The CCP has prevented independent journalists, investigators, and global health authorities from interviewing researchers at the WIV, including those who were ill in the fall of 2019. Any credible inquiry into the origin of the virus must include interviews with these researchers and a full accounting of their previously unreported illness,” the fact sheet said.

Although the Biden White House sidestepped comment for The Wall Street Journal’s report, the National Security Council said in a statement, “We continue to have serious questions about the earliest days of the Covid-19 pandemic, including its origins within the People’s Republic of China.”

David Asher, who led a Trump-era State Department task force on the origins of the virus, said he doubted the researchers who were sick had some pedestrian illness.

“I’m very doubtful that three people in highly protected circumstances in a level three laboratory working on coronaviruses would all get sick with influenza that put them in the hospital or in severe conditions all in the same week, and it didn’t have anything to do with the coronavirus,” he said.

The trio of illnesses, he said, might be “the first known cluster” of COVID-19 cases.

[admin]

https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-covid-vaccine-epidemic/

[admin]

Made in China: the coronavirus that killed millions of people
By Peter C Gøtzsche, Institute for Scientific Freedom, Copenhagen. Published here.19May 2021

"Organised denial
In February 2020, a group of virologists and others wrote in a Lancet letter:2 “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.” It is not a conspiracy theory that a virus can escape from a lab, it is a fact. The smallpox virus escaped three times from labs in England in the 1960’s and 1970’s, causing 80 cases and 3 deaths.1 Dangerous viruses have leaked out of labs almost every year since, and the SARS virus,responsible for the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome which emerged from Chinese bats in 2003 and killed 774 people,3 leaked from laboratories in Singapore and Taiwan, and twice from China.4 The most notable lab leak is the 1977 H1N1 lab escape from China that caused a worldwide influenza pandemic,4 mostly in young people,with about 700,000 deaths. It later turned out that the letter had been organized and drafted by Dr. Peter Daszak, president of the Eco Health Alliance of New York, which funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute. If the SARS-CoV-2virus had escaped from research he funded, he would be potentially culpable. The letter stated: “We declare no competing interests” even though already its strongly emotional title revealed this wasn’t true: “Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19.”The letter was only 350 words but had 27 authors. We call this persuasion by big numbers and authority."

etc. etc. much more:
https://www.scientificfreedom.dk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Made-in-China-the-coronavirus-that-killed-millions-of-people.pdf

[admin]

https://noqreport.com/2021/05/26/wuhan-lab-caught-deleting-files-proving-fauci-funding/

"Wuhan Lab Caught Deleting Files Proving Fauci Funding
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
May 26, 2021

Editor’s Note: The various paths that connect Dr. Anthony Fauci and the origins of Covid-19 are so numerous, it can be challenging to appropriately document them all. But what’s making it much harder is the fact that everyone from the Chinese Communist Party to the World Health Organization to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to Fauci himself are busy erasing as many connections as possible.

Internet archives offer us a way to not only find the connections, but discover the ways in which these connections are being systematically removed. The cover-up is just as important as the various crimes themselves because it demonstrates knowledge and intent. Fauci, the CCP, the WHO, the NIAID, and the CDC all know what they’ve done and are furiously attempting to keep it all under wraps.

Dr. Joseph Mercola’s article below is already being suppressed. Shortly after initial publication, we noticed it appeared and then was removed from search engines. It is imperative that Fauci and his cohorts are exposed for what they did to bring the pandemic into being as well as what they’re currently doing to suppress the facts. I hope you’ll read and share Dr. Mercola’s informative article:
STORY AT-A-GLANCE

    The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — a division of the National Institute of Health (NIH) headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci since 1984 — has, for years, provided grants to the EcoHealth Alliance and others to conduct gain-of-function (GoF) research on coronaviruses
    In a May 11, 2021, Senate hearing, Fauci denied ever having funded GoF research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). This despite clear documentation proving otherwise
    In March 2021 the WIV deleted mentions of its collaboration with the NIAID/NIH and other American research partners from its website. It also deleted descriptions of GoF on the SARS virus
    The NIH/NIAID has funded GoF research to the tune of at least $41.7 million. Up until 2014, this research was conducted by Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina (UNC). After 2014, when federal funding of GoF was banned, such research was funneled to the WIV via the EcoHealth Alliance
    In August 2020, the NIAID announced a five-year, $82-million investment in a new global network of Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases that will conduct GoF experiments to “determine what genetic or other changes make [animal] pathogens capable of infecting humans”

As reported in several previous articles, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — a division of the National Institute of Health (NIH) headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci since 1984 — has, for years, provided grants to the EcoHealth Alliance and others to conduct gain-of-function (GoF) research on coronaviruses.

EcoHealth Alliance, in turn, farmed out some of this research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), from whence SARS-CoV-2 appears to have emerged. In a May 11, 2021, Senate hearing, Sen. Rand Paul questioned Fauci on the NIAID’s funding of GoF research on bat coronaviruses, some of which was conducted at the WIV.

Fauci denied the charge, saying “The NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute.”1 It’s a curious denial, considering the NIH’s funding of such research has been thoroughly documented and can be easily double-checked.

    Fauci is clearly and provably lying … to Congress, which is a crime … and he’s lying to the American public. ~ Ben Swann

When Paul asks Fauci if the NIAID funded Dr. Ralph Baric’s GoF research, Fauci claims Baric “does not do gain-of-function research, and if it is, it is according to the guidelines and is being conducted in North Carolina.” Paul shoots back, saying:

“You don’t think him turning a bat virus spike protein, that he got from the Wuhan Institute into the SARS virus, is gain-of-function? You’d be in a minority, because at least 200 scientists have signed a statement from the Cambridge Working Group that it is gain-of-function.”
Save 66 Promo Code NOQ

In the video above, Jimmy Dore reviews the apparent lies dished out by Fauci during the Senate hearing. In the Truth in Media report below, investigative journalist Ben Swann lays out some of the proof, showing Fauci’s dishonesty.

“What’s insane about this exchange is that Fauci is clearly and provably lying … to Congress, which is a crime … and he’s lying to the American public,” Swann says.



NIH/NIAID Has Funded Gain-of-Function Research

As reported by Swann, the NIH/NIAID has funded GoF research to the tune of at least $41.7 million. Up until 2014, this research was conducted by Baric at the University of North Carolina (UNC). In 2014, the U.S. government issued a moratorium on federal gain-of-function research funding due to safety, ethical and moral concerns raised within the scientific community."

[admin]

Nobel Prize Winner Dr. Luc Montagnier On The Coronavirus
https://www.bitchute.com/video/N0LSGooA3AwG/

If you doubt that scientists are threatened with cancellation for speaking truth, simply look at the WHO.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=823.0

Do you suppose employees at the FDA, NIH or CDC feel any less threatened for asking the wrong questions in our cancel culture?

[admin]

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/post/157283610

[admin]

So why didn't the mainstream media investigate this beginning back in April 29 of 2020 when Newsweek broke the story?

"The biggest game at this year's Super Bowl didn't take place on the field. It was played out during the commercial breaks when three pharmaceutical commercials took to the air.

But those costly TV spots -- for issues including irritable bowel syndrome and toenail fungus -- represented just a fraction of the $5.2 billion in annual advertising spending from the drug industry. With that figure jumping 60 percent during just the last four years, critics are increasingly asking how the boom in pharmaceutical ads may be affecting consumers and the costs they pay for medication."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/drug-ads-5-2-billion-annually-and-rising/
_________________________________________

""Robert F Kennedy Jr. Says 70% Of News Advertising Revenue Comes From Big Pharma"

https://www.trueactivist.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr-says-70-of-news-advertising-revenue-comes-from-big-pharma-t1/

[admin]

From Highwire "Risky Business"
https://thehighwire.com/videos/risky-business/

[admin]

https://americaoutloud.com/gambling-on-biotechnology-on-the-slope-of-a-pandemic/

"The COVID-19 epidemic curves are waning, and America is returning to normal. On the minds of Americans is the COVID-19 mass vaccination program. After the registrational trials were complete, all of them looked safe primarily because the duration of the trials was short, and there were strict exclusion criteria such as COVID-19 recovered, suspected COVID-19 recovered, those with positive antibodies, pregnant women, and women of childbearing potential who could not guarantee contraception.

The sponsors and the FDA excluded these groups because they knew there was no benefit and only an opportunity to do harm. Additionally, the people who needed protection the most, nursing home patients, were not accessed for the trials.

Breaking with regulatory practice, once EUA approved, the FDA and CDC said, “vaccinate everyone.” Once approved and put into mass use, many groups, for the first time, were exposed to either the mRNA or adenoviral technologies, which trick the body into making the dangerous Wuhan spike protein, which we now know circulates in the body for two weeks.

This product of gain of function research in the Wuhan lab is what made SARS-CoV-2 super infectious and injurious to the body resulting in organ damage, respiratory failure, and blood clots. The vaccine, in a sense, is challenging the body with injectable bioterrorism in hopes of provoking immunity.

    As of May 21, 2021, the CDC has verified a record 262,521 safety reports including 4,406 deaths, and 14,986 hospitalizations. These exceed the numbers for all previous vaccines in all years combined in history.

If it were not a pandemic, these vaccines would have been pulled off the market at ~50 deaths. Americans are growing tenser every day as the grim numbers rise, and they see their children in the crosshairs of those with a syringe and a needle. I join Dan Ball of Real America on myocarditis or heart injury in children with the vaccine.

Next, Dr. Carey Savitch, an infectious disease physician, will give us color on inpatient care and why he took the vaccine. Then we finish with the final update from Dr. Peter Breggin, MD, on his book: “COVID-19 and the Global Predators:  We are the Prey”. The book is going to press, but the manuscript and timeline will be living documents as more evidence is revealed on how the viral disaster was planned and managed by those who sought to gain money, power, and global influence. Go ahead and pop those earbuds in, and let’s launch into The McCullough Report."

[admin]

[admin]

Dr. CHRIS MARTENSON ANALYZES THE FAUCI COVER-UP EMAILS BETWEEN BILL GATES, W.H.O. AND UNITED NATIONS
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BFx1upO7QZLT/

Coronavirus Contains "HIV Insertions", Stoking Fears Over Artificially Created Bioweapon
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/coronavirus-contains-hiv-insertions-stoking-fears-over-artificially-created-bioweapon

If the SARS-CoV-2 virus binds 1,000 times better to human cells than bats, then how are we supposed to believe it came from bats?
"COVID-19 Virus Binds to Human Cells 1,000 Times Tighter Than Its Closest Bat Relative"
https://www.newsweek.com/sars-cov-2-coronavirus-infect-cells-1516882

[admin]

https://zenodo.org/record/4028830#.X2BLu9MzZE7

"September 14, 2020 Working paper Open Access
Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route

Yan, Li-Meng; Kang, Shu; Guan, Jie; Hu, Shanchang

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has led to over 910,000 deaths worldwide and unprecedented decimation of the global economy. Despite its tremendous impact, the origin of SARS-CoV-2 has remained mysterious and controversial. The natural origin theory, although widely accepted, lacks substantial support. The alternative theory that the virus may have come from a research laboratory is, however, strictly censored on peer-reviewed scientific journals. Nonetheless, SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic virus. In this report, we describe the genomic, structural, medical, and literature evidence, which, when considered together, strongly contradicts the natural origin theory. The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone. Building upon the evidence, we further postulate a synthetic route for SARS-CoV-2, demonstrating that the laboratory-creation of this coronavirus is convenient and can be accomplished in approximately six months. Our work emphasizes the need for an independent investigation into the relevant research laboratories. It also argues for a critical look into certain recently published data, which, albeit problematic, was used to support and claim a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2. From a public health perspective, these actions are necessary as knowledge of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and of how the virus entered the human population are of pivotal importance in the fundamental control of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as in preventing similar, future pandemics."

Full report at the link:
https://zenodo.org/record/4028830#.X2BLu9MzZE7

[admin]

https://gnews.org/1298145/

The Chinese Communist have an obsession with viruses.

[admin]

Origin of the Fauci Flu



Viruses leaked from labs
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=virus+leaks+from+lab+history&t=h_&ia=web

[admin]

BREAKING! Recordings of Moderna Representative Making HORRIFIC Admission About Jab
https://rumble.com/viwkzh-breaking-recordings-of-moderna-representative-making-horrific-admission-abo.html

[admin]

mRNA Vaccines: The Silent Weapon
By Dr. Igor Shepherd
August 28, 2021

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/08/no_author/mrna-vaccines-the-silent-weapon/

[admin]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2077232/Scientist-deliberately-created-Armageddon-bird-flu-virus-lab-says-publish-details.html

"It’s too late to keep details of deadly flu a secret! U.S. scientists say details of virus created in laboratory ‘are already out there’, sparking renewed terror alert

By Fiona Macrae for the Daily Mail and Katie Silver
Updated: 03:38 EDT, 22 December 2011

A super-strain of bird flu that could infect and wipe out millions will not be published by the virologist developers.

Dutch scientists who created ‘probably one of the most dangerous viruses you can make' have agreed to leave out details on how to construct the virus from published reports. But the scientists warned that the data had already been shared with hundreds of researchers.

The decision was made after the US government warned releasing the details could be kill millions of people if it was used as a weapon of biological warfare.

Their research focused on what it took to convert bird flu – which can kill more than half of those infected but does not spread easily – into a highly contagious virus.

Developer Ron Fouchier of Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, Netherlands,  said this knowledge would be vital for the development of vaccines and drugs to prevent a possible pandemic.

But others argue the virus should never have been created – and warn the potential if it escaped from the lab is ‘staggering’. There are also fears the recipe will be seized on by terrorists looking for a biological weapon.

National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity chairman Paul Kiem, an anthrax expert, said: ‘I can’t think of another pathogenic organism that is as scary as this one. I don’t think anthrax is scary at all compared to this.’

The results, which were to be published in U.S. journal Science, were impeded in an unprecedented move by the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity, ABCNews reported.

The group is an independent advisory committee to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and other government agencies.

'Due to the importance of the findings to the public health and research communities, the NSABB recommended that the general conclusions highlighting the novel outcome be published, but that the manuscripts not include the methodological and other details that could enable replication of the experiments by those who would seek to do harm,' the committee said in a statement.

In response, Erasmus Medical Center said: 'The researchers have reservations about this recommendation but will observe it.'

In terms of how the virus will be used, Mr Fouchier said: 'We know which mutation to watch for in the case of an outbreak, and we can then stop the outbreak before it is too late.'

'Furthermore, the finding will help in the timely development of vaccinations and medication.'

However, others pointed out that similar fears – raised six years ago when another team of scientists recreated the Spanish flu virus that killed up to 50million in 1918 – proved groundless.

The latest controversy surrounds the H5N1 bird flu virus. In 2005, there were warnings of a potential bird flu global pandemic which would kill hundreds of millions.

Of the 573 people that have caught the bug so far worldwide, 336 have died. However, the germ’s inability to spread easily from person to person means the predicted pandemic has never materialised.

Now, scientists at the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam have created a H5N1 bird flu that spreads as easily as winter flu.

In experiments on ferrets – whose flu symptoms are most like humans’ – just five mutations in two key genes turned the ‘normal’ bird flu into a highly contagious, super-spreader.

The scientist behind the project, Ron Fouchier, said: ‘We now know which mutations to watch for in the case of an outbreak and we can stop the outbreak before it is too late.’

A university spokesman said: ‘If this type of research is carried out under maximum safety conditions, the benefits are greater than the risks.’

But Donald Henderson, an expert in biosecurity who spearheaded the worldwide drive to eradicate smallpox, told New Scientist magazine if a highly contagious virus with a 50 per cent kill rate got loose, ‘a catastrophe would result’.

Last night, the journal Science said the U.S. government’s request to publish only an abbreviated version of Dr Fouchier’s work was being taken very seriously.

Science's editor-in-chief Bruce Alberts said the journal was taking the NSABB's recommendation 'very seriously' but that they have 'concerns about withholding potentially important public-health information from responsible influenza researchers.'

'Many scientists within the influenza community have a bona fide need to know the details of this research in order to protect the public, especially if they currently are working with related strains of the virus,' said Alberts in a statement reported by ABCNews.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2077232/Scientist-deliberately-created-Armageddon-bird-flu-virus-lab-says-publish-details.html

[admin]

On 9 December 2019, just before the outbreak of the pandemic, Daszak gave an interview in which he talked in glowing terms of how his researchers at the Wuhan Institute had created over 100 new SARS-related coronaviruses, some of which could get into human cells and could cause untreatable SARS disease in humanized mice."

"A quote that best sums up the thinking inside many of our public health institutions comes from Peter Daszak, head of EcoHealth Alliance, a non-profit non-governmental organization that works closely with public health agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and intergovernmental organizations like the WHO (published in a 2016 report by the National Academy of Sciences): "Daszak reiterated that, until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs [medical counter measures] such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated.""

https://www.juliusruechel.com/2021/09/the-snake-oil-salesmen-and-covid-zero.html

[admin]

Authority trumps intelligence and conscience through this massive global psyop (psychological operation).
https://remnant-tv.com/video/world-vaccination-michael-matt-on-the-kennedy-connection

[admin]

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-09-21-sky-news-bomb-fauci-incredibly-stupid-coronavirus.html

"Sky News Australia drops bomb on Fauci, calls him “incredibly stupid” for funding illegal gain-of-function coronavirus research in Wuhan

Natural News) Sharri Markson of Sky News in Australia has dropped a major bomb on Tony Fauci and his contrived Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) plandemic narrative.

In a recent segment, Markson called out Fauci point-blank for funneling American taxpayer dollars to Wuhan, China, to conduct illegal gain-of-function research on coronaviruses.

Markson says that Fauci is “up to his neck” in crime, which “just shows how incredibly stupid” he is. Markson has been probing Fauci’s criminal activity for a while now, having uncovered that Fauci “had funded 60 projects at the Wuhan laboratory.”

“Then he wrote a paper where he said gain of function research was worth the risk of a pandemic, and that he had even funded coronavirus research in conjunction with the Chinese military,” Markson added.

Since the beginning of his tenure at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) back in 1984, Fauci has been complicit in funding “risky research” in China, including at the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), China’s only known level-four biosafety laboratory.

“He never mentioned that his agency was funding this, and he actually knew a whole lot about it,” Markson says about Fauci’s work over the past nearly 40 years that he has been employed in the federal government.

Markson put all of this together in a documentary called, “What Really Happened in Wuhan” that exposes Fauci for the criminal that he is. The documentary features interviews with both Mike Pompeo and President Donald Trump.

You can watch the segment with Markson below:

[admin]

Best read at link:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/nih-admits-fauci-lied-about-funding-wuhan-gain-of-function-experiments

"NIH admits Fauci lied about funding Wuhan gain-of-function experiments
by Tiana Lowe, Commentary Writer |
 | October 20, 2021 11:44 PM

Two years after Wuhan hosted the 2019 Military World Games, determined to be one of the planet's first superspreader events of the novel coronavirus pandemic, a top official at the National Institutes of Health has conceded that the agency did indeed fund highly dangerous gain-of-function research on bat-borne coronaviruses in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

In a letter to Kentucky Republican James Comer, the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, Lawrence A. Tabak of the NIH admitted that "out of an abundance of caution," and, of course, after two years of conspicuous indignant behavior that anyone would consider the lab-leak hypothesis, the nation's top medical research agency conducted an additional review of how the funds authorized by Dr. Anthony Fauci and friends were used by EcoHealth Alliance, the New York City-based nonprofit organization headed by frequent WIV collaborator Peter Daszak.

    NIH corrects untruthful assertions by NIH Director Collins and NIAID Director Fauci that NIH had not funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

    NIH states that EcoHealth Alliance violated Terms and Conditions of NIH grant AI110964. pic.twitter.com/cFOtJlRoWl
    — Richard H. Ebright (@R_H_Ebright) October 20, 2021

The bulk of Tabak's letter is spent minimizing the culpability of the NIH, but the admission is no less gratifying.

Per the letter, EcoHealth did indeed "fail to report" findings required by the terms of the NIH grant. More crucially, the gain-of-function experiments in question were conducted at the WIV. Tabak ultimately says that Daszak's EcoHealth has just five days to respond to the infraction. Daszak was last seen bullying into silence anyone who considered this possibility.

NIH has, until now, acquiesced to Fauci's pearl-clutching outrage at the idea that his department carved out exceptions from the Obama-era ban of gain-of-function research to fund EcoHealth. Not even a year ago, tried and true virologists such as Robert Redfield, President Donald Trump's head of the CDC, were smeared as Sinophobic bigots for entertaining the lab leak hypothesis, let alone the notion that Fauci and his friends actually funded the sort of experiments that probably brought about the virus's creation."

[admin]

Emails prove Fauci is not serving science, but politics.

[admin]

https://www.beaufortcountynow.com/post/52014/scientific-debate-silenced-with-deadly-consequences.html

Dr. Fauci: ‘I Represent Science’

On Nov. 28, 2021, I watched Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the chief medical adviser to the President of the United States, say on CBS’s Face the Nation: “It’s easy to criticize [me], but they are really criticizing science, because I represent science.”

I thought, how interesting, in China, science is used to serve the Communist Party. The CCP represents science in China. The CCP’s science is not to be criticized or questioned, but to be followed. If you criticize the Party, you are criticizing the representative of science. Now suddenly in the United States we have an individual who says he represents science! And anyone who dares to challenge him is deemed anti-science.

Science is about facts and truth. The interpretation of facts is often debated to reach well-thought-out conclusions. Research findings must go through a peer-review process before being recognized as scientific. When was this basic scientific principle replaced by CCP-style science, where a powerful and influential person claims to represent science, and therefore cannot be criticized?

In June 2021, after the contents of redacted emails from Dr. Fauci on the origins of COVID-19 were published, some things that had puzzled me from the beginning of the pandemic started to make sense.

I was a true believer in science and devoted my career to vaccine development for two decades, the second of which was with the largest vaccine company in the world at that time. I always believed in my fellow scientists as being noble, trustworthy, honest, and humble. So I almost fell out of my chair when I read a research paper in February 2020 on Nature Medicine’s website titled “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2.” It was written by Kristian Andersen (Scripps Institute), Andrew Rambaut (University of Edinburgh), Ian Lipkin (Columbia University), Edward Holmes (University of Sydney), and Robert Garry (Tulane University).

The authors showed that SARS-CoV-2 binds to human ACE2 much better than any computer programs predicted. “Thus, the high-affinity binding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human ACE2 is most likely the result of natural selection on a human or human-like ACE2 that permits another optimal binding solution to arise. This is strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not the product of purposeful manipulation,” they wrote.

 

Excuse me? If SARS-CoV-2 infects people better than your computer predicts, then the only conclusion you can draw is that your computer sucks. How did these world-renowned scientists get the basic logic so wrong? And how did the prestigious publication Nature Medicine not catch that? Did anyone even read the paper before publishing it, not to mention peer review it?

This paper, as crappy as it is, has been read 5.64 million times, referenced by 2,123 other papers, and used by authority figures such as Dr. Fauci to conclude that the debate on COVID-19’s origin is over, and label the possibility of a non-natural origin for SARS-CoV-2 as a conspiracy theory.

It seemed that the SARS-CoV-2 origin narrative had been decided upon—even when the existing facts did not support the narrative. The scientists took the existing facts and forced them to fit the preferred narrative, and also forced the general public to accept it, while silencing all other opinions and essentially banning scientific debate on the issue.

These scientists remind me of the agricultural experts in China in 1958.

Seeing what was happening in the science world, and the controlled narrative of the authorities on scientific matters, as a former proud scientist I was dismayed and distressed. I couldn’t believe prominent scientists like Kristian Andersen and publications like Nature Medicine could betray the very principle of science: telling the truth. Instead, they used people’s trust in science to silence scientific debate and advance their own narrative. This is Subjective Science, the Mao-style totalitarian science, at work in the free world!

I decided to write to Nature Medicine to complain about the paper and demand a retraction or at least an explanation. I sent my letter, titled “It is Premature to Conclude that SARS-CoV-2 Did not Have a Lab Origin,” by email on April 15 but did not receive a reply. Then I forwarded my email to Andersen, the paper’s lead author, with no response either.

Maybe I was being naive to question their science. It might have actually been their intention to use the facts to draw conclusions that are opposite to the facts, and drive the narrative directed by their masters—just like the so-called agricultural experts praising the fake reports in China during the Great Leap Forward.

It would take a corrupt system to do that. Is this really happening in America, I wondered?

Andersen’s Flip-Flop

Well, the Fauci emails accessed via Freedom of Information Act requests made public in June 2021 revealed what happened. On Jan. 31, 2020, Andersen emailed Fauci about the coronavirus, saying, “some of the features (potentially) look engineered.” The next day, a group of people, including Fauci and Andersen, held a secret teleconference. The Nature Medicine article concluding that “Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus” was published online a few days later (and finalized on March 17, 2020).

We now know that in early February 2020, something happened to change Andersen’s opinion from “some of the features (potentially) look engineered” to “SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.” Sounds exactly like what Subjective Scientists would do.

Interestingly, after the publication of the paper—which was used by Fauci to silence all other voices—the main authors, Andersen and Garry, received an $8.9 million grant from Fauci’s NIAID on Aug. 17, 2020.

A win-win-win all around. But the taxpayers are the losers, the public are the losers, and potentially millions of lives are at risk due to this Mao-style Subjective Science.

It turns out I wasn’t the only one questioning the Nature Medicine paper. In January 2021, Dr. Steven Quay from Seattle published a paper titled “Bayesian Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Origin” where he revealed he had written to Andersen on May 25, 2020, questioning his conclusions. He didn’t get a response either. Instead, Andersen blocked Quay from following his Twitter account.

There are so many lessons to be learned from missteps during this pandemic, such as the rushed vaccines, the damaging lockdowns, the denial of sound early treatments, the disregarding of natural immunity, and so on. In my opinion, the most important lesson is that we must get back to science that is fact-based, Objective Science. Any scientific conclusions must be vigorously debated based on raw data, and no one should be allowed to claim to represent science.

Facts and truth are stubborn. They are sometimes slow in coming, but they do bubble to the surface eventually. Dr. Fauci and company tried very hard to suppress the scientific investigation that SARS-CoV-2 might have escaped from a laboratory. Now, it has become an accepted possibility, after all attempts to find a natural origin failed.
Natural Immunity

The issue of natural immunity and how it was cut out of the equation in the fight against COVID is another example of Subjective Science.

It is known to all scientists with even a slight immunology training that a person develops natural immunity after recovering from an infection. The protection afforded by natural immunity is what all vaccines strive to achieve; some do it better than others, but vaccines rarely surpass natural immunity. It was extremely anti-science to impose vaccine mandates on the millions in Canada and America who contracted and then recovered from COVID-19. Now, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control admits in a report released on Jan. 28 that natural immunity against COVID-19 is superior to any of the available vaccine regimens.

So what happens to people who lost their jobs because they refused to take the jab, but have recovered from COVID and are now immune? Why not adjust the vaccine mandate accordingly? Why are public health policies still dictated by a few people “representing the science” rather than by science itself?

It is refreshing, though, to see that the scientific community has started to awaken to the narrative-driven reports in scientific journals. For example, the prestigious British Medical Journal published an editorial on Jan. 19 titled “Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now.” It is a timely call and relates to the very core of the issue. In order to know the science, we have to have the facts.

But don’t expect to be able to peruse the raw data on the safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccines any time soon, as Pfizer has indicated that it will not begin entertaining requests for trial data until May 2025. We paid for the vaccines with our tax dollars (and many paid with their lives, as vaccine-related deaths do happen), but we’re asked to just take the vaccine and blindly trust the “representatives of science” like Dr. Fauci, without any kind of verification that the vaccines are safe and effective?

The agricultural experts in China during the Great Leap Forward did release their data, just no one believed any of it was real. I just hope people’s trust in scientists today is not in danger of plummeting to that point. Substantial changes in our scientific funding system are needed if confidence in science’s reputation is to be restored.

Before Canada and the United States become Mao-style communist states, we still have a chance to get rid of Subjective Science and restore fact-based, Objective Science. That will put us in a much better position to take on the next challenge Mother Nature may throw at us."
____________________________________________

Fauci's NIH proclaimed back in 2005 that:

"The Virology Journal - the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health - published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading: “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” Write the researchers, “We report...that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”

DEADLY COVER UP: Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005 - nobody needed to die
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=399.0
_______________________________________

 "The Nature article also referenced Peter Daszak, whose organization EcoHealth Alliance acted as a funding conduit between Fauci’s NIAID and the Wuhan lab.

In 2020 Fauci assigned Daszak to a commission charged with determining whether the Wuhan lab was a possible source of the COVID-19 virus. Daszak eventually was recused, after his Ecohealth connections were publicized.

By that point however, the commission had already released an influential conclusion that the virus was likely natural in origin, and had no connection to the Wuhan lab. Those findings were used throughout 2020 to suppress any journalistic communications or digging into counter facts as “conspiracy theories”.

It’s clear that both Daszak and Fauci both had conflicts of interest with respect to having any role in determining the origins of the virus.

The Nature article quoted Daszak defending the work of Ralph Baric, a stateside expert in gain-of-function experimentation, who interfaced with Wuhan lab researchers:

“But Baric and others say the research did have benefits. The study findings ‘move this virus from a candidate emerging pathogen to a clear and present danger’, says Peter Daszak, who co-authored the 2013 paper. Daszak is president of the EcoHealth Alliance, an international network of scientists, headquartered in New York City, that samples viruses from animals and people in emerging-diseases hotspots across the globe."

https://trendsresearch.com/nature-magazine-contradicts-fauci-senate-testimony/

[admin]

bump

[admin]

[admin]

"The Terrifying Bioweapons Arms Race With Francis Boyle, Ph.D."
https://twitter.com/ChildrensHD/status/1733139379307381248

[admin]

https://www.independent.org/multimedia/detail.asp?id=7390