https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/expert-answers/coronavirus-drugs/faq-20485627Why does the Mayo Clinic parrot dangerous, dated, false and misleading information about HCQ?
"Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine. These malaria drugs were authorized for emergency use by the FDA during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the FDA withdrew that authorization when data analysis showed that the drugs are
not effective for treating COVID-19. They can also cause serious heart problems."
So are we expected to believe that because of the "serious heart problems" they claim is caused by HCQ, that the Mayo Clinic has never prescribed it to any of the millions of Americans that take it daily over decades, for Lupus and RA, in the same dosage as the Zelenko Protocol prescribes over just 7 days?
For an elderly or high-risk individual to "go home and isolate" and let COVID-19 progress to the point of needing hospitalization, is far more dangerous than taking HCQ+Z+AZ in the early outpatient setting.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=225.0I'm only asking, but could the reason they continue to peddle unsound information be because if everybody were being cured on an outpatient basis with $16.38 worth of pills, then hospitals wouldn't be making (the average according to FAIR Health) $73,300 per patient, and Gilead wouldn't be making the $3,100-$6,400 per patient on Remdesivir, once the patient's condition degenerates to the point of needing hospitalization?
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=452.0In stark contrast Henry Ford Hospital would seem to care about the welfare of their patients enough to want to immediately administer an effective remedy, rather than tow the Gilead/Big Pharma, FDA, illness industry, profit line.https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=139.0"Our mission is to improve people’s lives through excellence in the science and art of health care and healing. For more than 100 years, we have proudly pioneered clinical and scientific breakthroughs that have advanced health care here and abroad."
"Unfortunately, the political climate that has persisted has made any objective discussion about this drug impossible, and we are deeply saddened by this turn of events. Our goal as scientists has solely been to report validated findings and allow the science to speak for itself, regardless of political considerations."
They requested from the FDA to be able to use HCQ on their early admission patients even with a strict set of qualifiers, but were denied the ability to do so, by the perpetrators of The Great American Genocide at the FDA.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=384.0In other words the FDA stood between the doctor and patient, and overruled the doctor and denied the suffering patient a cure that can be up to 99-100% effective in the early outpatient setting (and as Henry Ford had previously found HCQ reduced mortality by 50% even in the hospital inpatient setting), which as a result will continue to add to tens of thousands more completely unnecessary deaths from COVID-19, even though the hospital wanted to do right by their patients.
