We do not recommend for or against vaccines, but we do advocate for information

[admin]

Please read the important disclaimer at the following link before proceeding further on this page. The administrator of this forum is not a doctor nor licensed or experienced in any aspect of the health care industry, so the subjects in this forum mainly depend on articles and videos by medical and science professionals that are imminently qualified.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=227.0

[edit add 12-8-22] How can doctors give informed consent when the vaccine package insert is blank? They can't, which is a violation of the Nuremberg code and a crime against humanity for exposing people to a medical experiment without informed consent.
https://rumble.com/embed/v1wv60y/?pub=4 [end edit]

[edit add preface 10-31-21] Most of this page was penned on February 9th, before the delta variant and before vaccine news such as the J&J (Janssen) vaccine efficacy being shown to drop from 88% to 3% effective over just 6 months, or the Pfizer vaccine demonstrating such low efficacy against delta that it couldn't even get emergency use authorization for use as a booster except among the elderly, while Iceland is the first country to stop administering the Moderna vaxx for all ages because of myocarditis and other vaccine related adverse events, as several other countries stopped administering it to young persons. [end edit added preface]
_____________________________________

We do not recommend either for or against vaccines in this forum since that is a personal matter that should be decided on the basis of each person's informed consent and subsequent personal calculation of risk VS reward. Since recipients of whichever COVID-19 vaccine are volunteering to be test subjects in a massive trial of a questionable corporation's investigational, experimental, genetically engineered, chemically enhanced, innate immune response reprogramming, leaky, escape mutant training, gene therapy - the longer term consequences of which only God can know - what we do advocate for is that the trial subjects be fully informed about the vaccine before it is administered, as per the Declaration of Helsinki.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki#Basic_principles

Importantly, those who do decide to skip the vaccine need to fortify their immune systems and have a concrete plan in place for prophylaxis, as well as for early treatment with a multi-drug/nutraceutical therapy to take in the event that they do become infected. Preparation along with education provide the added benefit of neutralizing fear. This is not intended to minimize the fact that COVID is a dangerous pathogen that can result in serious short and long term negative consequences, particularly for the immunocompromised, so it needs to be dealt with immediately upon presentation of symptoms or clinical suspicion of COVID-19 - particularly in elderly and high-risk individuals.

Are vaccine recipients being informed that "There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19."?
"IMPORTANT WARNING: There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19"

Are recipients being informed that the trial they are volunteering to become a phase 3 test subject in for the Moderna vaccine won't be concluded until October 27, 2022 and Pfizer not until January 31, 2023?

Are recipients made aware that prior to release, the vaccines were tested on younger healthier individuals and not the elderly, pregnant, or those with comorbidities?

Are recipients informed about how the FDA weighs in on the possible long term consequences to the immune systems of the test subjects (that is, everyone that has received it)?: 
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
"8.4. Unknown Risks/Data Gaps"
"Vaccine-enhanced disease
Available data do not indicate a risk of vaccine-enhanced disease, and conversely suggest effectiveness against severe disease within the available follow-up period. However, risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown and needs to be evaluated further in ongoing clinical trials and in observational studies that could be conducted following authorization and/or licensure."

Doesn't that seem to suggest that anyone and everyone that claims these vaccines are "safe" are either ignorant of the FDA's caution, are outright lying, or at best hopefully wishing, since not a soul on earth can know what future problems these vaccines will bring in terms of vaccine-enhanced disease/pathogenic priming or other immune system compromise like microscopic blood clots killing off capillaries, myocarditis (heart muscle inflammation) and arrhythmia, weakening the immune system's ability to fight cancer and a host of other as yet unknown long term side effects some of which will not be known until the generation that is currently in the womb reaches child bearing age. Particularly as immunity wanes and the vaccinated demonstrate a "vaccine-enhanced disease" response, to the the next (of many) genetically engineered bio-weapons the CCP unleashes, like the one they developed that causes encephalitis (brain swelling) in genetically engineered "humanized" franken-mice?
"Covid-19 and the Global Predators: We are the Prey"

Particularly since earlier trials demonstrated the dangers of corona virus mRNA vaccines that were developed back in 2012:  "Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus"
"Conclusions: These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.":
What is "vaccine-enhanced disease" or "pathogenic priming"?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/

[edit add 10-10-21] Are recipients informed that: "In conclusion, the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses, which should be considered in the development and use of this new class of vaccines."
https://europepmc.org/article/PPR/PPR334978
https://thehighwire.com/videos/do-covid-mrna-vaccines-disrupt-the-innate-immune-system/ [end edit]

Are recipients made aware that vaccine manufacturers are exempt from liability for damages that may result from the vaccine, regardless of negligence or the extent of those damages? The cost of any injury that results will be borne by the recipient and/or their insurance provider.
So how much time was spent trying to get it right, with tens of billions of dollars to be won, by the first ones over the finish line?
Could Pfizer's vaccine's effectiveness be as low as 19% to 29%?
Swine Flu Vaccination

[edit add 8-26-21] Are recipients informed about Pfizer's "extensive criminal history" which according to the article at the following link includes crimes against humanity for using African children as test subjects without parental consent?
".....the journal Europe PMC published a study outlining the extensive criminal history of Pfizer, one of the most corrupt pharmaceutical companies in the world."
https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/2875889 [end edit]

[edit add 9-29-21] Are vaccine recipients told that "The average age of death from COVID is 78. The average life expectancy in America is 78." and there is about a 99.97% chance of survival for those that are under 70, which is a risk of death from COVID of about 3 in 10,000 (99.8% survival globally for all ages), including obese diabetics with heart disease and cancer, and without the benefit of 99+% effective early treatment for those 3 out of 10,000 that did die (which should add a couple of zeros against the risk of death)?
Are recipients told that a Johns Hopkins study found that the "the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19"?
Each of us must shoulder responsibility for developing our own risk VS reward ratio.[end edit]

[edit add 9-26-21] Are recipients made aware that the CDC had to change the definition of vaccine to even be able to call these novel, experimental, never before tried in humans, genetically engineered chemically enhanced biological agents, vaccines?
The new government definition is “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.” This language replaces prior wording that a vaccination produces “immunity” to a specific disease. [end edit]

[edit add 7-27-21] Are vaccine recipients being informed that fully vaccinated persons can still become infected with, as well as transmit, COVID-19? Since the vaccine dramatically reduces symptoms, fully vaccinated persons that are infected, can be asymptomatic transmitters of the virus. So absent symptoms, how could a fully vaccinated person know whether they are transmitting COVID-19 to a parent or grandparent or the baby in their own home, for example?
Yet the incidence of asymptomatic transmission by persons that are not vaccinated, has been essentially zero, since the beginning of the pandemic.
In 2020 there was essentially no chance of asymptomatic COVID spread
So, might many vaccinated persons may have accomplished the opposite, of what they had hoped to achieve?[end edit]

Are recipients being made aware that the current vaccines were not substantially tested on animals prior to their release, like the prior failed corona virus vaccines that never made it past the animal testing phase, because the ferrets died from vaccine-enhanced disease response?
What is "vaccine-enhanced disease" or "pathogenic priming"?

[edit add 8-26-21] Are recipients told they will likely have to return for a booster 6 to 8 months after their first series of jabs, and perhaps regularly after that?
mRNA vaccine inventor - universal vaccination is worst possible strategy  [end edit]

[added 7-22-21] Are vaccine recipients informed that as a phase 3 test subject in this trial of unapproved, experimental, genetically engineered, chemically enhanced, biological agents, that they are entered into the Pharmaco-Vigilance Tracking System operated by Google and Oracle? [end edit]

[added 7-17-21] Were pregnant women that have been getting the jab ever since December, told that there were ZERO vaccine trials run on pregnant women, and that the vaccine makers didn't even begin to organize an observational study until July 22, 2021, that is scheduled to run over a 21-month period?
Experts warn of ‘huge risk’ as Moderna launches COVID vaccine trials for pregnant women
The most important videos to date on vaccines (additions 10-2-21) [end edit]

[edit add 7-2-21] Are vaccine recipients being told that a Harvard study revealed that as few as 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported through the voluntary VAERS system?
VAERS - Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System - less than 1% are reported
The other 99% that are not reported stand as if they never happened. Particularly those adverse reactions that happen beyond the 3-day or 2 week post-vaccine intervals since vaccines don't leave fingerprints on symptoms, conditions, or long term immune system damage.
The Bill Gates Effect: WHO’s DTP Vaccine Killed More Children in Africa Than the Diseases it Targeted [end edit]

[edit add 7-20-21] While a CDC whistleblower suggests that vaccine deaths may be under reported by a factor of 5 - that is more like 50,000 vaccine deaths in the U.S.:
Dr. McCullough: ‘whistleblowers’ inside CDC claim vaxx already killed 45,000 [end edit]

[edit add 6-24-21] What can we learn about these engineered agents today - from the inventor? https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f/how-to-save-the-world,-in-three-easy:0?r=FuWwFotRbicqY9GHyWBqDdTNNHpaTgC9 [end edit]

Are recipients being informed that Moderna "Failed to Bring a Single Product to Market in 10 Years; Until COVID" when they jumped into bed with the NIH? on the company, from The Defender on discrepancies in vaxx death rates.

Disturbingly: "In November 2017, the mRNA technology was safety-tested by Maja Sedic and her colleagues in Sprague-Dawley rats and cynomolgus monkeys at the Montreal and Sherbrooke facilities of Charles River Laboratories. They found, inter alia, that "mRNA is a labile biological molecule and therefore requires the use of protective delivery systems to effectively harness its potential," as the mRNA spread beyond the injection site and was found in the liver, spleen, bone marrow and heart.[27]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moderna#2017
Which is exactly what the Japan biodistribution study discovered about Moderna's current vaxx.
".....the Japanese data showed that the infamous spike protein of the coronavirus gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination and then accumulated in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands, and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries."
"Spike protein is very dangerous, it's cytotoxic"
Re: Important vaccine update from Dr. Peter McCollough

Why didn't they style the vaccines traditionally like these from 2008 and 2014?
Why not a vaccine like these developed in 2014 and 2008 for other SARS viruses?
Could it be because Big Pharma couldn't patent a naturally occurring virus?
It isn't like they couldn't have made a traditional vaccine for COVID-19, since that's the way the Chinese styled theirs:
Chinese Sinovac vaccine works by exposing immune system to dead viral debris

God alone knows what will happen over the next year or two or 10, or in the immune systems of the generation conceived through a vaccinated parent - in regard to disease enhancement/pathogenic priming, fertility issues or compromised immune systems - yet in spite of all this pragmatists that take a wait-and-see approach rather than volunteering to be guinea pigs in phase 3 of a drug trial and Big Pharma experiment, are demonized and vilified as kooks and "anti-vaxxers", even though the FDA indicates that even they don't know what the consequences of waning immunity and subsequent viral challenge will be in the future.

The fact that critics of world leading virologists, epidemiologists, scientists and board certified critical care physicians - which are generally journalists, politicians, bureaucrats and TV celebrities out shilling for Big Pharma - feel compelled to begin their arguments by falsely labeling pragmatic skeptics of these unapproved, experimental, genetically engineered biological/chemical agents as "anti-vaxxers", speaks volumes as to the veracity of their hollow claims, extent of their expertise, lack of capacity for critical thought and content of their character.

We hope as time passes, this massive experiment/drug trial will be found to have worked out OK for those who volunteered to be phase 3 trial subjects (all vaxxed individuals) - or at least those that haven't already been killed by the short term consequences.
VAERS - Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System - less than 1% are reported

Here's Tucker Carlson with a pragmatic view including some stats on COVID vaccines:
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6252794642001#sp=show-clips

[edit as of 6-13] How's Europe doing? As of June 5th "13,867 DEAD 1,354,336 Injuries: European Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 “Vaccines”" 
Re: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System

Simply deciding against getting the vaccine might be a risky approach, since COVID-19 can be a very dangerous disease that can end with the patient drowning in their own body fluids with an average COVID hospital bill at $73,300 (no wonder the U.S. Illness Industry would seem to want as many hospitalized as possible!).
Even some younger people have become "long haulers", that have been suffering sometimes debilitating symptoms for going on a year now, after becoming infected. Many likely still unaware, largely because of Google/YouTube and Facebook censorship, that there are inexpensive measures they can take that may improve their condition.
COVID-19 Long-Haulers, post-COVID Syndrome - Persistent or Post-Acute Symptoms 

If a person chooses not to get the vaccine, they need to have a solid plan in place for diet, supplements and/or drugs to be taken as prophylaxis to help prevent or mitigate infection.
Prevention, Prophylaxis, Nutraceuticals and Natural Therapies for COVID-19 - also discussion of lockdowns and facemasks
A plan of action should also be in place to be implemented immediately upon presentation of symptoms or clinical suspicion of COVID-19.
Ivermectin treatment is a ‘real killer of coronavirus’ - a "wonder drug"
If a person's plan is to simply count on a local clinic or their doctor after they get sick, the odds are better than not that they will be sorely disappointed, by their physician's treatment "plan" (that is, lack thereof). Therefore it's important to inquire of and plan with your doctor in advance of infection.
NIH deadly recommendations compared to those of COVID-competent professionals
A person could become particularly disappointed if that doctor plans to waste crucial time in early treatment, by waiting for the results of notoriously unreliable PCR testing, that produce 67% false negative results even at day four of infection.
The deadly consequences of unreliable COVID-19 testing
Even a New York Times article put it:  "If You Have Coronavirus Symptoms, Assume You Have the Illness, Even if You Test Negative"
Day 1 the false negative rate is 100% and at day 4 still 67% false negative

"Dr. Ryan Cole, CEO & M. D. of Cole Diagnostics regarding Covid, vaccine, & treatments"
When Google/YouTube bans the video in the player below, you can access it at this BitChute link:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/i3rlgX5MtyfK/



Back to the subject of fully informing COVID vaccine recipients:

this item added 6-17-21: Are recipients made aware of how the effectiveness was arrived at?  "3. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines
There were public declarations of greater than 90 per cent effectiveness for the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines. Unfortunately, Pfizer did not publicly disclose the fact that there were large numbers of suspected, but unconfirmed cases of COVID-19 that were excluded from their calculation of efficacy. This was revealed in a summary report issued by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Re-analysis of the data with this new information accounted for was performed by the associate editor of the British Medical Journal, who reported his non-peer-reviewed findings in the journal’s opinion column. His estimate suggests the true effectiveness of the vaccine might be as low as 19 to 29 per cent. This can’t be confirmed or refuted until raw data not included in the FDA report are released."
Could Pfizer's vaccine's effectiveness be as low as 19% to 29%?

We also advocate that information be offered to vaccine recipients about effective early outpatient treatment as well as prophylaxis alternatives, that have been up to 100% successful in treatment of elderly and high-risk individuals ever since March of 2020, for those that may prefer the natural course of infection and cure resulting in naturally derived antibodies and immunity, as opposed to that derived artificially from experimental biological agents.
Up to 99+% Effective, EARLY Stage OUTtpatient Treatment for COVID-19, With World Renowned $20 Remedies

However in the case of COVID-19 and the imperative of early treatment, it's important to discuss and arrange for your desired course of treatment with your doctor in advance of infection so there will be no surprise if he denies you your chosen treatment later on, thereby precluding you from moving confidently forward on a timely basis.
NIH deadly recommendations compared to those of COVID-competent professionals

Are recipients being made aware of the possible side effects as listed on the vaccine insert?
The following are only meant for example and may only include part of the information available from the manufacturers.
It would seem each individual needs to take responsibility for fully informing themselves.
https://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/
Excerpt: "HAS THE MODERNA COVID-19 VACCINE BEEN USED BEFORE?
The ModernaCOVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine."
https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download

Have recipients been made aware that unanticipated long term consequences could result?
What is "vaccine-enhanced disease" or "pathogenic priming"?
"Why mass vaccination amidst a pandemic creates an irrepressible monster"

Have recipients been informed that there are inexpensive alternatives like ivermectin as prophylaxis, as well as in highly effective early treatment protocols for COVID-19, since information about inexpensive, generic, repurposed, time-tested, heavily prescribed drugs like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine has been stymied, demonized and censored by the mainstream media, search engines and social media, government bureaucracy/Big Pharma ever since April of 2020?
Up to 99+% Effective, EARLY Stage OUTtpatient Treatment for COVID-19, With World Renowned $20 Remedies

Of course recipients haven't been informed of that, because if the FDA admitted to that fact, it would not have been able to issue Emergency Use Authorization to an experimental vaccine based on a Big Lie, toward Big Pharma and government bureaucrat's benefit.
Government panel - 9 had relationships with Gilead, 2 on Gilead advisory board
FDA’s revolving door: Companies often hire FDA drug reviewers that approved drug
Hidden conflicts? Pharma payments to FDA advisers after drug approvals spark ethical concerns
Gilead: Twenty-one billion reasons to discredit hydroxychloroquine
Pseudo-Science behind the Assault on Hydroxychloroquine - wattsupwiththat.com

To repeat this important point since this is the reason all prior SARS vaccines failed in the animal testing phase, are recipients being informed that the future side effects of the vaccine are completely unknown, as indicated by this link to the FDA, that was copied and pasted into this forum on 2-9-21 (still at FDA on 3-10-21)?
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
Under:  "8.4.Unknown Risks/Data Gaps"
"Vaccine-enhanced disease
Available data do not indicate a risk of vaccine-enhanced disease, and conversely suggest effectiveness against severe disease within the available follow-up period. However, risk of vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown and needs to be evaluated further in ongoing clinical trials and in observational studies that could be conducted following authorization and/or licensure."
What is "vaccine-enhanced disease" or "pathogenic priming"?

In other words, every vaccine recipient is part of a large experiment, the results of which will not be known until well into the future as their immunity wanes and their system is challenged by a wild virus.

And again, simply skipping the vaccine and remaining ignorant, and thus failing to prepare for possible infection and early treatment, could be risky. The purpose of this forum is to present articles and information from world leading microbiologists, virologists, epidemiologists and highly successful treating physicians that have been engaged in the COVID-19 front line trenches ever since February of 2020, to help readers make informed decisions about which path they wish to take and encourage them to fully prepare for their choice in advance, without delay.

[edit add on 6-9-21] "Blaylock On Vaccines:  What You Need To Know For Informed Consent"
https://www.technocracy.news/blaylock-on-vaccines-what-you-need-to-know-for-informed-consent/?print=pdf [end edit]

[admin]

A bit surprising to see how many people are willing to become test subjects of an experiment. Can we suppose these percentages would have been the same, if folks had been informed, even with just the list presented in the original post?
COVID-19 Vaccinations in the United States
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations
by country https://ourworldindata.org/covid-cases

Particularly considering the odds of dying from COVID according to Dr. Simone Gold who reported that if a person is under 20 there is a 99.997% chance of survival from COVID-19, for ages 20 to 49 the survival rate is 99.98%, and in 50 to 69 year-olds the survival rate is 99.5% and if you are over 70 the survival rate approaches 95%.
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/covid-19/vaccine-information

Bear in mind that those numbers include obese and high-risk individuals, with all stats by and large being the result of an absence of early treatment, which would otherwise have improved the rates by 85% and theoretically even up to 99-100% survival for all groups, depending on how early the intervention is started and the skill of the clinician.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=359.0

If you take issue with her numbers, do the math yourself:
Here's a chart of resident population by age:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/241488/population-of-the-us-by-sex-and-age/
Here's a chart of COVID deaths by age from February 17, 2021:
https://www.heritage.org/data-visualizations/public-health/covid-19-deaths-by-age/

[admin]

Discussion of ingredients at the 17 minute mark of the second video on this page:
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontline-news/can-vaccinated-people-make-the-unvaccinated-sick-watch-dr-palevsky-explain

"What ingredients are in the COVID-19 vaccines?

Most of the COVID-19 vaccines are made of mRNA, a set of instructions for our cells to make a harmless piece of what is called a spike protein. The protein is found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19. These instructions teach the immune system how to make antibodies (protective proteins) against COVID-19 that can prevent illness.
Learn more at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines.html.


Pfizer ingredients:

Active Ingredient

    nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2

Lipids

    (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis (ALC-3015)
    (2- hexyldecanoate),2-[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide (ALC-0159)
    1,2-distearoyl-snglycero-3-phosphocholine (DPSC)
    cholesterol

Which one of those chemicals were tested for long term side effects when administered to a human being? Which combination of those ingredients were ever tested for long term side effects?

Salts

    potassium chloride
    monobasic potassium phosphate
    sodium chloride
    basic sodium phosphate dihydrate

Other

    sucrose


Moderna ingredients:

Active ingredient

    mRNA (Nucleoside-modified mRNA encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2

Lipids

    Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol (DMG)
    1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
    Cholesterol
    SM-102 (Proprietary to Moderna)  [SM-102 (heptadecan-9-yl 8-((2-hydroxyethyl) (6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy) hexyl) amino) octanoate)]

Salts

    Thromethamine
    Thomethamine hydrocholoride
    Acetic acid
    Sodium Acetate

Other

    Sucrose


Johnson & Johnson ingredients:

The vaccine includes the following ingredients: recombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, citric acid monohydrate, trisodium citrate dihydrate, ethanol, 2 hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HBCD,) polysorbate-80, and sodium chloride."

https://faqs.in.gov/hc/en-us/articles/360053861492-What-ingredients-are-in-the-COVID-19-vaccines-

"The J&J/Janssen vaccine was 66.3% effective in clinical trials (efficacy) at preventing laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 illness in people who had no evidence of prior infection 2 weeks after receiving the vaccine."
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/janssen.html

[admin]

 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32659783/
Jul 13, 2020
A perspective on potential antibody-dependent enhancement of SARS-CoV-2
Ann M Arvin  1   2 , Katja Fink  3   4 , Michael A Schmid  3   4 , Andrea Cathcart  3 , Roberto Spreafico  3 , Colin Havenar-Daughton  3 , Antonio Lanzavecchia  3   4 , Davide Corti  3   4 , Herbert W Virgin  5   6
Affiliations

    PMID: 32659783 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2538-8

Abstract

Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease is a general concern for the development of vaccines and antibody therapies because the mechanisms that underlie antibody protection against any virus have a theoretical potential to amplify the infection or trigger harmful immunopathology. This possibility requires careful consideration at this critical point in the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Here we review observations relevant to the risks of ADE of disease, and their potential implications for SARS-CoV-2 infection. At present, there are no known clinical findings, immunological assays or biomarkers that can differentiate any severe viral infection from immune-enhanced disease, whether by measuring antibodies, T cells or intrinsic host responses. In vitro systems and animal models do not predict the risk of ADE of disease, in part because protective and potentially detrimental antibody-mediated mechanisms are the same and designing animal models depends on understanding how antiviral host responses may become harmful in humans. The implications of our lack of knowledge are twofold. First, comprehensive studies are urgently needed to define clinical correlates of protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Second, because ADE of disease cannot be reliably predicted after either vaccination or treatment with antibodies-regardless of what virus is the causative agent-it will be essential to depend on careful analysis of safety in humans as immune interventions for COVID-19 move forward.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8

[admin]

Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies
Wen Shi Lee  1 , Adam K Wheatley  1   2 , Stephen J Kent  3   4   5 , Brandon J DeKosky  6   7   8
Affiliations

    PMID: 32908214 DOI: 10.1038/s41564-020-00789-5

Abstract

Antibody-based drugs and vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are being expedited through preclinical and clinical development. Data from the study of SARS-CoV and other respiratory viruses suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could exacerbate COVID-19 through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). Previous respiratory syncytial virus and dengue virus vaccine studies revealed human clinical safety risks related to ADE, resulting in failed vaccine trials. Here, we describe key ADE mechanisms and discuss mitigation strategies for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies in development. We also outline recently published data to evaluate the risks and opportunities for antibody-based protection against SARS-CoV-2.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-020-00789-5

[admin]

Long-Term Studies Of COVID-19 Vaccines Hurt By Placebo Recipients Getting Immunized
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/969143015/long-term-studies-of-covid-19-vaccines-hurt-by-placebo-recipients-getting-immuni

[admin]

Please understand that the deaths attributed to COVID-19 in the chart below are, by and large, fraudulently inflated by as much as 80%.
https://noqreport.com/2021/04/20/cdc-violated-law-to-inflate-covid-cases-and-fatalities/

https://www.statmap.org/

[admin]

https://coronanews123.wordpress.com/2021/01/25/the-coming-genocide-of-adverse-covid-vax-reactions-and-who-to-blame-for-it/

[admin]

Zelenko says move slowly.
Not enough information to calculate risk/reward ratio.
https://citizenfreepress.com/column-2/dr-zelenko-i-have-many-patients-suffering-from-vaccine-regret/

[admin]

"Massive 145-Country Study Shows Sharp INCREASE of Transmission and DEATH After Introduction of COVID Vaccines"
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/massive-145-country-study-shows-sharp-increase-transmission-death-introduction-covid-vaccines/

[admin]

Nurse States Everybody On Covid Floor In Hospital The Last Two Months Were Those 100% Vaccinated.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/L1KaiBnexbZK/

[admin]

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/ineffective-unsafe-and-unnecessary/
"Ineffective, unsafe and unnecessary . . . "

[admin]

Please click on this link and visit the video title listed under it.
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/videos/dr-gold-speaks-at-reawaken-america-tour/
"Dr. Gold Speaks at ReAwaken America Tour"

[admin]

Dr. Peter McCullough on vaccine centers being empty
https://www.reddit.com/r/NoNewNormal/comments/onfxt3/dr_peter_mccullough_on_vaccine_centers_being_empty/

I guess not everybody wants to be a participant in a massive trial of an unapproved, genetically engineered, chemically enhanced, biological agent and entered into the Pharmaco-Vigilance Tracking System operated by Google and Oracle.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=634.0

[admin]

BREAKING! Recordings of Moderna Representative Making HORRIFIC Admission About Jab
https://rumble.com/viwkzh-breaking-recordings-of-moderna-representative-making-horrific-admission-abo.html

[admin]

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/

"Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

"Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent."

https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=652.0

[admin]

Nurse says that the majority of patients being admitted to her hospital are not COVID related, but are being admitted for vaccine related injury. Staff not allowed to even talk about it.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/09/11/an-articulate-nurse-dealing-with-covid-hospitalization-gives-honest-insight-about-what-really-is-happening-alarming-secondary-confirmation-of-details-provided-and-cited/#comments

[admin]

"Unvaxed at Risk from Vaxed – Karen Kingston

If you have been vaxed pharmaceuticals are developing pills that will help keep the genetically engineered proteins from attacking your body."

https://rumble.com/vn4k09-unvaxed-at-risk-from-vaxed-karen-kingston.html

[admin]

https://deathship.wordpress.com/2021/10/02/boosters-how-to-kill-more-people-with-impunity/

"Boosters: how to kill more people with impunity
Posted on 2021   

And what is the secret ingredient in the Pfizer vaccine?

by Jon Rappoport

October 1, 2021

PART ONE:

Out of a jumble of announcements from the CDC and the FDA, a few decisions are emerging:

The US government will recommend COVID booster shots for people 65 and older; people between 50 and 64 who have underlying medical conditions; and, as the Daily Mail reports, “people who live in institutional settings that increase their risk of exposure, such as prisons or homeless shelters, as well as health care workers, teachers and grocery store employees.”

People 65 and older already tend to have health conditions. Worse, most of them have been receiving medical treatment for years in the form of toxic drugs. Jabbing them with a shot which has already caused enormous numbers of injuries and deaths is a recipe for disaster.

I would call it targeting.

“—Let’s take the weakest people and hit them with a booster(s) on top of the other two shots they’ve already had.”

And to expand the destruction, people between 50 and 64 WITH UNDERLYING MEDICAL CONDITIONS should also take the booster.

Note: Hitting these two groups with boosters has a further payoff for the government. When the vaccine recipients die or sustain severe injuries, the blame can be put on “their underlying conditions,” (or “the virus”).

Medically speaking, the overall guiding principle here is: the vaccine isn’t working by any reasonable standard, and it’s causing devastating effects, so let’s force more of it on people.

The news media are collaborators. They provide the elementary one-two punch: “The pandemic continues to spread; the only answer is the vaccine.”

Anybody can grasp that message and nod his head in agreement. The fact that the message is wrong and false on every level is irrelevant to its success.

However, the MANDATES are a different story. Governments believe they can push whole populations against the wall and keep them there year after year after year.

But fascism reaches a breaking point.

Rebellion is now building across the world.

PART TWO:

Update: Statement from ICAN on FDA’s reply letter: click here.

Recently, the ICAN organization (Informed Consent Action Network) announced a disturbing fact about the Pfizer COVID vaccine:

“The FDA assured the public that it will provide transparency for any COVID-19 vaccine it approves. That promise would surely include letting the public know what is in the vial being injected into the arms of millions of people. Nonetheless, the FDA has chosen to hide from the public an ingredient that constitutes more than 20% of the undiluted vial of each Pfizer vaccine!”

“Upon licensure of the Pfizer vaccine, the FDA authorized a fact sheet to be given to the public, which includes a list of ingredients in the vaccine. Amazingly, this list doesn’t mention a secret ingredient. What is the secret ingredient? Nobody knows other than Pfizer and the FDA. In the technical documentation that is not intended for general public distribution, the FDA disclosed that this secret ingredient constitutes about 22% of the undiluted vial (0.45 mL of 2 mL) but completely redacted the name of the secret ingredient.”

“ICAN’s attorneys immediately contacted the FDA and asked for the redaction to be lifted. However, the FDA refused to do so without a formal demand. Therefore, ICAN, through its attorneys, submitted a formal demand to the FDA to disclose the identity of the secret ingredient.”

Conclusion: Without the disclosure of every ingredient in the vaccine, INFORMED CONSENT IS IMPOSSIBLE. A person told to take the shot could refuse on the grounds that he can’t obtain sufficient information in order to provide his consent.

And on what grounds could the vaccine be legal in the first place? If informed consent is the law, then withholding the possibility of it by concealing a vaccine ingredient would automatically render the vaccine illegitimate.

We’re not talking about a cook in a deli who says he has a secret blend of spices he adds to the brisket. This is a genetic injection intended for the whole planet."

[admin]

After Dr. Vladimir Zelenko and his team treated nearly 7,000 elderly and high-risk patients, with 0 deaths over the last 7 months, he details that success while warning in this video of September 2021 in regard to the vaxx and ADE, and other potential negative outcomes.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iaLlZN0q8rjk/

[admin]

Wise Traditions podcast 292: It's Gene Therapy, Not a Vaccine
https://rumble.com/vdf9c1-wise-traditions-podcast-292-its-gene-therapy-not-a-vaccine.html

[admin]

https://liveyosemite.wordpress.com/2021/08/06/misleading-reports-of-fda-approval-of-pfizer-vaccine/

"Misleading Reports of FDA Approval of Pfizer “Vaccine”
Posted byDoug Peck August 6, 2021

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter McCullough have commented on the misleading media reports that the Pfizer “vaccine” has been approved by the FDA. The foulest villains in this deception are the sellout Biden and his handmaiden Fauci:

Dr. Peter McCullough’s guest on The McCullough Report this week, Dr. David Wiseman, PhD, explained:

“When you read in the mainstream press that ‘the Pfizer vaccine has been approved’, no, it hasn’t. The BioNtech version (called Comirnaty) has been approved”, but only conditionally pending further studies including pregnancy and heart effects, and it isn’t available yet. Here is The McCullough Report this week:

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Brighteon interview:

https://www.brighteon.com/7bc6967a-ac24-4710-a116-88574d0f7ecf

Children’s Health Defense article:

“The Pfizer vaccine is now obsolete (due to the variants). Pfizer now has hundreds of millions of doses that it needs to unload. The FDA’s move this week was clearly designed to help Pfizer unload those doses as quickly as possible even though the FDA knows the vaccine is absurdly dangerous” (there have been more than 12,000 deaths and 450,000 serious injuries in the U.S. after taking the vaccines).

The vaccine that the FDA approved is for a product called Comirnaty which they are making available only in Europe, not in the U.S. But the U.S. media has misleadingly reported simply that the Pfizer vaccine has been approved by the FDA.

Now the Department of Defense and businesses and universities will try use this misleading report to mandate the vaccine.

Under the Emergency Use Authorization “COVID vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. Vaccine manufacturers, distributors, providers and government planners are immune from liability. The only way an injured party can sue is if he or she can prove willful misconduct, and if the U.S. government has also brought an enforcement action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit has ever succeeded.”

“Americans, told that the Pfizer COVID vaccine is now licensed, will understandably assume COVID vaccine mandates are lawful. But only EUA-authorized vaccines, for which no one has any real liability, will be available during the next few weeks when many school mandate deadlines occur.”

“The FDA appears to be purposefully tricking American citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product.”

“There are millions of Americans out there who still value our country and still value our constitutional rights and are willing to speak up and to fight for them.”

Dr. Robert Malone, who has been called “the inventor of mRNA technology”, who recently came out in opposition to the mass vaccination program, commented on this deceptive FDA and media incident (the clip is from a Finnish news organization):

https://rapsodia.fi/pfizerin-fda-hyvaksynta-ei-koske-nykyista-rokotetta

Intentional Confusion?

The simple solution in this time of confusion and deceitfulness is to just say, “No!” to any vaccine mandates. Your life may depend on it. Legal teams are standing by to help us avoid any harmful consequences from employers and schools if necessary, such as the America’s Front Line Doctors legal team and the Highwire ICAN legal team.

Eric Clapton, “This Has Gotta Stop!”:

[admin]

bump